Xeon Gold 5418Y vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Intel

Xeon Gold 5418Y

24 Cores48 Thrd185 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

38 Cores76 Thrd270 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······

Xeon Gold 5418Y vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 5418Y vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 5418Y vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 5418Y

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $6,236 less on MSRP ($1,483 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
  • Delivers 409.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($1,483 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
  • Draws 185W instead of 270W, a 85W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (45,660 vs 46,681).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 57 MB).

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

2021

Why buy it

  • +2.2% higher PassMark.
  • +26.7% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 45 MB).
  • 60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5418Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 30.8 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $1,483 MSRP).
  • 45.9% higher power demand at 270W vs 185W.
  • Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5418Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5418Y better than Xeon Platinum 8368Q?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 5418Y is ahead with a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8368Q pulls ahead with 2.2% better PassMark. Xeon Platinum 8368Q also has the bigger cache pool with 26.7% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 45 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8368Q is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.2% better PassMark, backed by 38 cores and 76 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 26.7% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 45 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 5418Y is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 5418Y comes in $6,236 cheaper on MSRP at $1,483 MSRP versus $7,719 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8368Q is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.2% better PassMark. It is also 409.1% better value on MSRP (30.8 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 5418Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon Gold 5418Y vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon Gold 5418Y

The Xeon Gold 5418Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 45,660 points. Launch price was $1,493.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,681 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 5418Y packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5418Y versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5418Y (base: 2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5418Y uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5418Y scores 45,660 against the Xeon Platinum 8368Q's 46,681 — a 2.2% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q. L3 cache: 45 MB on the Xeon Gold 5418Y vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q.

FeatureXeon Gold 5418YXeon Platinum 8368Q
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
38 / 76+58%
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+3%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.6 GHz+30%
L3 Cache
45 MB
57 MB (total)+27%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-30%
10 nm
Architecture
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark
45,660
46,681+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 5418Y uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Xeon Gold 5418Y versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — the Xeon Gold 5418Y supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 80 (Xeon Gold 5418Y) vs 128 (Xeon Platinum 8368Q) — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon Gold 5418Y) and SP3,C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368Q).

FeatureXeon Gold 5418YXeon Platinum 8368Q
Socket
LGA4677
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
4800+50%
3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096
4096
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
80
128+60%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5418Y rivals EPYC 9334; Xeon Platinum 8368Q rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

FeatureXeon Gold 5418YXeon Platinum 8368Q
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Gold 5418Y was priced at $1483, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q came in at $7719. On launch pricing ($1483 vs $7719), Xeon Gold 5418Y was $6236 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 5418Y delivers 30.8 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — making the Xeon Gold 5418Y the 134.3% better value option.

FeatureXeon Gold 5418YXeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP
$1483-81%
$7719
Performance per Dollar
30.8+413%
6.0
Release Date
2023
2021

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.