EPYC 8224P vs Xeon Gold 5418Y

AMD

EPYC 8224P

24 Cores48 Thrd160 WWMax: 3 GHz2023
EPYC family
····
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 5418Y

24 Cores48 Thrd185 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 8224P vs Xeon Gold 5418Y Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8224P vs Xeon Gold 5418Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8224P vs Xeon Gold 5418Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8224P

2023

Why buy it

  • +42.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 45 MB).
  • Costs $628 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $1,483 MSRP).
  • Delivers 72.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 30.8 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $1,483 MSRP).
  • Draws 160W instead of 185W, a 25W reduction.
  • 20% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5418Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (45,421 vs 45,660).

Xeon Gold 5418Y

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.8 vs 53.1 PassMark/$ ($1,483 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
  • 15.6% higher power demand at 185W vs 160W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5418Y better than EPYC 8224P?
Yes. Xeon Gold 5418Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 5418Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5418Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 5418Y is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 8224P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 5418Y comes in 73.5% more expensive on MSRP at $1,483 MSRP versus $855 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 8224P is also 72.5% better value on MSRP (53.1 vs 30.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 5418Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 24/48. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 8224P vs Xeon Gold 5418Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 8224P

The EPYC 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,421 points. Launch price was $855.

Intel

Xeon Gold 5418Y

The Xeon Gold 5418Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 45,660 points. Launch price was $1,493.

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 8224P and Xeon Gold 5418Y share an identical 24-core/48-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8224P versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5418Y — a 23.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5418Y (base: 2.55 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 8224P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5418Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8224P scores 45,421 against the Xeon Gold 5418Y's 45,660 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 5418Y. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8224P vs 45 MB on the Xeon Gold 5418Y.

FeatureEPYC 8224PXeon Gold 5418Y
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
24 / 48
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.8 GHz+27%
Base Clock
2.55 GHz+27%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+42%
45 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
5 nm-29%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Siena (2023−2024)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
45,421
45,660
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8224P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5418Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 5418Y supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 255.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8224P) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 5418Y). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8224P) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5418Y) — the EPYC 8224P offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8224P) and C741 (Xeon Gold 5418Y).

FeatureEPYC 8224PXeon Gold 5418Y
Socket
SP6
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
4800
4800
Max RAM Capacity
1152
4096+256%
RAM Channels
6
8+33%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
96+20%
80
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 8224P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5418Y). Direct competitor: EPYC 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Xeon Gold 5418Y rivals EPYC 9334.

FeatureEPYC 8224PXeon Gold 5418Y
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 8224P was priced at $855, while the Xeon Gold 5418Y came in at $1483. On launch pricing ($855 vs $1483), EPYC 8224P was $628 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8224P delivers 53.1 pts/$ vs 30.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5418Y — making the EPYC 8224P the 53.2% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 8224PXeon Gold 5418Y
MSRP
$855-42%
$1483
Performance per Dollar
53.1+72%
30.8
Release Date
2023
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.