Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 7542 vs EPYC 8224P

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 7542

32 Cores64 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2019
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

EPYC 8224P

24 Cores48 Thrd160 WWMax: 3 GHz2023
EPYC family
····
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7542 vs EPYC 8224P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7542
32 / 64
45,359
0.0%
brand logoRyzen 5 8600G
brand logoRyzen 9 8945H
brand logoRyzen AI 9 HX 370
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
EPYC 8224P
24 / 48
45,421
+0.1%
brand logoRyzen 5 8600G
brand logoRyzen 9 8945H
brand logoRyzen AI 9 HX 370
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7542 vs EPYC 8224P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 7542
low194 FPS
medium172 FPS
high138 FPS
ultra111 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low157 FPS
medium129 FPS
high108 FPS
ultra86 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 7542
low431 FPS
medium385 FPS
high315 FPS
ultra252 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low392 FPS
medium348 FPS
high284 FPS
ultra227 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 7542
low630 FPS
medium536 FPS
high486 FPS
ultra415 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low858 FPS
medium771 FPS
high745 FPS
ultra668 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 7542
low910 FPS
medium830 FPS
high716 FPS
ultra621 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low1018 FPS
medium908 FPS
high770 FPS
ultra647 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 7542
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 7542
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 7542
low292 FPS
medium221 FPS
high203 FPS
ultra183 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low319 FPS
medium244 FPS
high210 FPS
ultra186 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 7542
low297 FPS
medium262 FPS
high205 FPS
ultra162 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low252 FPS
medium221 FPS
high171 FPS
ultra136 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 7542
low308 FPS
medium275 FPS
high255 FPS
ultra208 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low309 FPS
medium272 FPS
high250 FPS
ultra200 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 7542
low230 FPS
medium203 FPS
high171 FPS
ultra159 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low244 FPS
medium214 FPS
high181 FPS
ultra166 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 7542 vs EPYC 8224P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7542

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 128 MB vs 64 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
  • ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (45,359 vs 45,421).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.3 vs 53.1 PassMark/$ ($3,400 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
  • ❌40.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 160W.
  • ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 8224P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC 8224P

2023

Why buy it

  • ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
  • ✅Costs $2,545 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $3,400 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 298.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 13.3 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $3,400 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 160W instead of 225W, a 65W reduction.
  • ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (64 MB vs 128 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8224P better than EPYC 7542?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 7542 is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8224P pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. EPYC 7542 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8224P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 8224P is the better buy right now. EPYC 8224P comes in $2,545 cheaper on MSRP at $855 MSRP versus $3,400 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 7542 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 298.2% better value on MSRP (53.1 vs 13.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 8224P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 32/64. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7542 vs EPYC 8224P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7542

The EPYC 7542 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 45,359 points. Launch price was $3,400.

AMD

EPYC 8224P

The EPYC 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,421 points. Launch price was $855.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7542 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 8224P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7542 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7542 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 8224P — a 12.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 7542 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The EPYC 7542 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 8224P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7542 scores 45,359 against the EPYC 8224P's 45,421 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 8224P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7542 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8224P.

FeatureEPYC 7542EPYC 8224P
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+33%
24 / 48
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+13%
3 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+14%
2.55 GHz
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+100%
64 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+51100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
7 nm, 14 nm
5 nm-29%
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark
45,359
45,421
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7542 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 8224P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7542 versus 4800 on the EPYC 8224P — the EPYC 8224P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7542 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 255.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7542) vs 6 (EPYC 8224P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7542) vs 96 (EPYC 8224P) — the EPYC 7542 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7542) and SP6 (EPYC 8224P).

FeatureEPYC 7542EPYC 8224P
Socket
SP3
SP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity
4096+256%
1152
RAM Channels
8+33%
6
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+33%
96
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7542 rivals Xeon Gold 6248R; EPYC 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

FeatureEPYC 7542EPYC 8224P
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7542 was priced at $3400, while the EPYC 8224P came in at $855. On launch pricing ($3400 vs $855), EPYC 8224P was $2545 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7542 delivers 13.3 pts/$ vs 53.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 8224P — making the EPYC 8224P the 119.7% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7542EPYC 8224P
MSRP
$3400
$855-75%
Performance per Dollar
13.3
53.1+299%
Release Date
2019
2023
Search EPYC 7542 on AmazonSearch EPYC 8224P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.