EPYC 7452
EPYC 7542
EPYC 7452 vs EPYC 7542 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7452 vs EPYC 7542 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7452 vs EPYC 7542: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7452
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,375 less on MSRP ($2,025 MSRP vs $3,400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 69.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.6 vs 13.3 PassMark/$ ($2,025 MSRP vs $3,400 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 155W instead of 225W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
EPYC 7542
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (45,359 vs 45,764).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.3 vs 22.6 PassMark/$ ($3,400 MSRP vs $2,025 MSRP).
- ❌45.2% higher power demand at 225W vs 155W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7452 better than EPYC 7542?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7452 vs EPYC 7542 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7452
The EPYC 7452 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 45,764 points. Launch price was $2,025.
EPYC 7542
The EPYC 7542 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 45,359 points. Launch price was $3,400.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7452 and EPYC 7542 share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7452 versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7542 — a 1.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 7542 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). Both are built on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture using a 7 nm, 14 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 7452 scores 45,764 against the EPYC 7542's 45,359 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 7452. Both processors carry 128 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 7452 | EPYC 7542 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.35 GHz | 3.4 GHz+1% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 45,764 | 45,359 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7452 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7542 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7452) and SP3 (EPYC 7542).
| Feature | EPYC 7452 | EPYC 7542 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7452 rivals Xeon Gold 6248R; EPYC 7542 rivals Xeon Gold 6248R.
| Feature | EPYC 7452 | EPYC 7542 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7452 was priced at $2025, while the EPYC 7542 came in at $3400. On launch pricing ($2025 vs $3400), EPYC 7452 was $1375 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7452 delivers 22.6 pts/$ vs 13.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 7542 — making the EPYC 7452 the 51.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7452 | EPYC 7542 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2025-40% | $3400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.6+70% | 13.3 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7452 and EPYC 7542
