EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 7452

EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 7452 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 73F3

16 / 32

46,103

+0.7%

Ryzen 7 5800

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

EPYC 7452

32 / 64

45,764

0.0%

Ryzen 5 7400F

Ryzen 9 3900

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 7452 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 7452: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 73F3

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 22.6 PassMark/$ ($3,521 MSRP vs $2,025 MSRP).
❌54.8% higher power demand at 240W vs 155W.

EPYC 7452

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,496 less on MSRP ($2,025 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
✅Delivers 72.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.6 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($2,025 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
✅Draws 155W instead of 240W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 73F3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (45,764 vs 46,103).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 73F3 better than EPYC 7452?

Yes. EPYC 73F3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 73F3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 73F3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 73F3 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7452 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 73F3 comes in 73.9% more expensive on MSRP at $3,521 MSRP versus $2,025 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7452 is also 72.6% better value on MSRP (22.6 vs 13.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 73F3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019), 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 32/64. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 7452 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 73F3

The EPYC 73F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,103 points. Launch price was $3,521.

EPYC 7452

The EPYC 7452 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 45,764 points. Launch price was $2,025.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 73F3 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7452 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7452 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 73F3 versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7452 — a 17.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 73F3 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 73F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 7452 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 73F3 scores 46,103 against the EPYC 7452's 45,764 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 73F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 73F3 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7452.

Feature	EPYC 73F3	EPYC 7452
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	32 / 64+100%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+19%	3.35 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+59%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+100%	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm+	7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	46,103	45,764

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 73F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7452 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (EPYC 73F3) and SP3 (EPYC 7452).

Feature	EPYC 73F3	EPYC 7452
Socket	SP3	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 73F3) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7452). Direct competitor: EPYC 73F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; EPYC 7452 rivals Xeon Gold 6248R.

Feature	EPYC 73F3	EPYC 7452
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 73F3 was priced at $3521, while the EPYC 7452 came in at $2025. On launch pricing ($3521 vs $2025), EPYC 7452 was $1496 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 73F3 delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 22.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 7452 — making the EPYC 7452 the 53.3% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 73F3	EPYC 7452
MSRP	$3521	$2025-42%
Performance per Dollar	13.1	22.6+73%
Release Date	2021	2019

Search EPYC 73F3 on Amazon

Search EPYC 7452 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.