EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon W-3175X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 73F3

16 Cores32 Thrd240 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon W-3175X

28 Cores56 Thrd255 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon W-3175X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 73F3

16 / 32

46,103

0.0%

Ryzen 7 5800

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon W-3175X

28 / 56

46,125

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon W-3175X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon W-3175X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 73F3

2021

Why buy it

✅+564.9% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 39 MB).
✅Draws 240W instead of 255W, a 15W reduction.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (46,103 vs 46,125).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($3,521 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).

Xeon W-3175X

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $522 less on MSRP ($2,999 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
✅Delivers 17.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.4 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (39 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3175X better than EPYC 73F3?

Yes. Xeon W-3175X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3175X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3175X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3175X is the better buy right now. Xeon W-3175X comes in $522 cheaper on MSRP at $2,999 MSRP versus $3,521 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 17.5% better value on MSRP (15.4 vs 13.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 73F3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2018) and 564.9% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 39 MB). That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon W-3175X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 73F3

The EPYC 73F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,103 points. Launch price was $3,521.

Xeon W-3175X

The Xeon W-3175X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 46,125 points. Launch price was $2,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 73F3 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3175X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3175X has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 73F3 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon W-3175X — a 5.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 73F3 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 73F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon W-3175X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 73F3 scores 46,103 against the Xeon W-3175X's 46,125 — a 0% lead for the Xeon W-3175X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 73F3 vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3175X.

Feature	EPYC 73F3	Xeon W-3175X
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	28 / 56+75%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+5%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+13%	3.1 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+565%	38.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm+-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	46,103	46,125
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	31,350
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,467
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	17,358

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 73F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3175X uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 73F3 versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-3175X — the EPYC 73F3 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 73F3 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 512 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 73F3) vs 6 (Xeon W-3175X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 73F3) vs 48 (Xeon W-3175X) — the EPYC 73F3 offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (EPYC 73F3) and Intel C621 (Xeon W-3175X).

Feature	EPYC 73F3	Xeon W-3175X
Socket	SP3	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	3200+20%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+700%	512 GB
RAM Channels	8+33%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+167%	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon W-3175X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 73F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

Feature	EPYC 73F3	Xeon W-3175X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 73F3 was priced at $3521, while the Xeon W-3175X came in at $2999. On launch pricing ($3521 vs $2999), Xeon W-3175X was $522 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 73F3 delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3175X — making the Xeon W-3175X the 16.1% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 73F3	Xeon W-3175X
MSRP	$3521	$2999-15%
Performance per Dollar	13.1	15.4+18%
Release Date	2021	2018

Search EPYC 73F3 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3175X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.