EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q
EPYC 73F3
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 73F3
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 73F3 | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($2,100) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,719) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 73F3 | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+263%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($2,100) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,719) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 73F3 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q
EPYC 73F3
The EPYC 73F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,103 points. Launch price was $3,521.
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,681 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The EPYC 73F3 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 73F3 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — a 7.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 73F3 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 73F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 73F3 scores 46,103 against the Xeon Platinum 8368Q's 46,681 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 73F3 vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q.
| Feature | EPYC 73F3 | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 38 / 76+138% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+8% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+35% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+349% | 57 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm+-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 46,103 | 46,681+1% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 73F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (EPYC 73F3) and SP3,C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368Q).
| Feature | EPYC 73F3 | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 73F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Xeon Platinum 8368Q rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.
| Feature | EPYC 73F3 | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 73F3 launched at $3521 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q debuted at $7719. At current prices ($2100 vs $7719), the EPYC 73F3 is $5619 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 73F3 delivers 22.0 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — making the EPYC 73F3 the 113.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 73F3 | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3521-54% | $7719 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2100-73% | $7719 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.0+267% | 6.0 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 73F3 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q
