
EPYC 73F3

Xeon w5-2555X
EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon w5-2555X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon w5-2555X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon w5-2555X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 73F3
2021Why buy it
- ✅+658.5% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 34 MB).
- ✅Draws 240W instead of 252W, a 12W reduction.
- ✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-2555X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (46,103 vs 47,638).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 44.6 PassMark/$ ($3,521 MSRP vs $1,069 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon w5-2555X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w5-2555X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,452 less on MSRP ($1,069 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 240.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.6 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($1,069 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (34 MB vs 256 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w5-2555X better than EPYC 73F3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon w5-2555X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 73F3
The EPYC 73F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,103 points. Launch price was $3,521.

Xeon w5-2555X
The Xeon w5-2555X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 33.75 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 252 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 47,638 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The EPYC 73F3 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w5-2555X offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the EPYC 73F3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 73F3 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-2555X — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-2555X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The EPYC 73F3 is built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 73F3 scores 46,103 against the Xeon w5-2555X's 47,638 — a 3.3% lead for the Xeon w5-2555X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 73F3 vs 33.75 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon w5-2555X.
| Feature | EPYC 73F3 | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+14% | 14 / 28 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+6% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+659% | 33.75 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm+ | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | — |
| PassMark | 46,103 | 47,638+3% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 73F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w5-2555X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 73F3 versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-2555X — the Xeon w5-2555X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 73F3) vs 112 (Xeon w5-2555X) — the EPYC 73F3 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (EPYC 73F3) and W790 (Xeon w5-2555X).
| Feature | EPYC 73F3 | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+14% | 112 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w5-2555X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 73F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Xeon w5-2555X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 73F3 | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 73F3 was priced at $3521, while the Xeon w5-2555X came in at $1069. On launch pricing ($3521 vs $1069), Xeon w5-2555X was $2452 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 73F3 delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 44.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-2555X — making the Xeon w5-2555X the 109.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 73F3 | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3521 | $1069-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.1 | 44.6+240% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















