EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon w5-2555X

AMD

EPYC 73F3

16 Cores32 Thrd240 WWMax: 4 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon w5-2555X

14 Cores28 Thrd252 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon w5-2555X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon w5-2555X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon w5-2555X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 73F3

2021

Why buy it

  • +658.5% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 34 MB).
  • Draws 240W instead of 252W, a 12W reduction.
  • 14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-2555X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (46,103 vs 47,638).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 44.6 PassMark/$ ($3,521 MSRP vs $1,069 MSRP).
  • Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon w5-2555X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w5-2555X

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $2,452 less on MSRP ($1,069 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
  • Delivers 240.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.6 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($1,069 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
  • Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (34 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w5-2555X better than EPYC 73F3?
Yes. Xeon w5-2555X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon w5-2555X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w5-2555X is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.3% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon w5-2555X is the better buy right now. Xeon w5-2555X comes in $2,452 cheaper on MSRP at $1,069 MSRP versus $3,521 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 240.3% better value on MSRP (44.6 vs 13.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon w5-2555X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 28 threads instead of 16/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon w5-2555X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 73F3

The EPYC 73F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,103 points. Launch price was $3,521.

Intel

Xeon w5-2555X

The Xeon w5-2555X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 33.75 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 252 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 47,638 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The EPYC 73F3 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w5-2555X offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the EPYC 73F3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 73F3 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-2555X — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-2555X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The EPYC 73F3 is built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 73F3 scores 46,103 against the Xeon w5-2555X's 47,638 — a 3.3% lead for the Xeon w5-2555X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 73F3 vs 33.75 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon w5-2555X.

FeatureEPYC 73F3Xeon w5-2555X
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+14%
14 / 28
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4.8 GHz+20%
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+6%
3.3 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+659%
33.75 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm+
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark
46,103
47,638+3%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 73F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w5-2555X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 73F3 versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-2555X — the Xeon w5-2555X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 73F3) vs 112 (Xeon w5-2555X) — the EPYC 73F3 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (EPYC 73F3) and W790 (Xeon w5-2555X).

FeatureEPYC 73F3Xeon w5-2555X
Socket
SP3
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
3200
4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity
4096
4096
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+14%
112
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w5-2555X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 73F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Xeon w5-2555X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

FeatureEPYC 73F3Xeon w5-2555X
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 73F3 was priced at $3521, while the Xeon w5-2555X came in at $1069. On launch pricing ($3521 vs $1069), Xeon w5-2555X was $2452 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 73F3 delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 44.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-2555X — making the Xeon w5-2555X the 109.2% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 73F3Xeon w5-2555X
MSRP
$3521
$1069-70%
Performance per Dollar
13.1
44.6+240%
Release Date
2021
2024

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.