EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 7402

CPU

GPU

EPYC 73F3

16 Cores32 Thrd240 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7402

24 Cores48 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 7402 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 73F3

16 / 32

46,103

+0.2%

Ryzen 7 5800

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

EPYC 7402

24 / 48

46,012

0.0%

Ryzen 7 5800

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 7402 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 7402: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 73F3

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($3,521 MSRP vs $1,783 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 240W vs 180W.

EPYC 7402

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,738 less on MSRP ($1,783 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
✅Delivers 97.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($1,783 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
✅Draws 180W instead of 240W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 73F3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (46,012 vs 46,103).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 73F3 better than EPYC 7402?

Yes. EPYC 73F3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 21.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 73F3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 21.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 256 MB versus 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 73F3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 73F3 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7402 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 73F3 comes in 97.5% more expensive on MSRP at $3,521 MSRP versus $1,783 MSRP, and it still gives you a 21.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7402 is also 97.1% better value on MSRP (25.8 vs 13.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 73F3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 256 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 7402 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 73F3

The EPYC 73F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,103 points. Launch price was $3,521.

EPYC 7402

The EPYC 7402 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 46,012 points. Launch price was $1,783.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 73F3 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7402 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7402 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 73F3 versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402 — a 17.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 73F3 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 73F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 7402 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 73F3 scores 46,103 against the EPYC 7402's 46,012 — a 0.2% lead for the EPYC 73F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 73F3 vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7402.

Feature	EPYC 73F3	EPYC 7402
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+19%	3.35 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+25%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+700%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm+	7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	46,103	46,012
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	28,546
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,299
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	12,622

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (EPYC 73F3) and SP3,Rome (EPYC 7402).

Feature	EPYC 73F3	EPYC 7402
Socket	SP3	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 73F3 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 73F3) vs AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7402). Primary use case: EPYC 7402 targets Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 73F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; EPYC 7402 rivals Xeon Gold 6242.

Feature	EPYC 73F3	EPYC 7402
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU
Target Use	—	Server / Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 73F3 was priced at $3521, while the EPYC 7402 came in at $1783. On launch pricing ($3521 vs $1783), EPYC 7402 was $1738 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 73F3 delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 25.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 7402 — making the EPYC 7402 the 65.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 73F3	EPYC 7402
MSRP	$3521	$1783-49%
Performance per Dollar	13.1	25.8+97%
Release Date	2021	2019

Search EPYC 73F3 on Amazon

Search EPYC 7402 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.