EPYC 73F3
EPYC 4464P
EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 4464P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 4464P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 4464P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 73F3
2021Why buy it
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4464P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (46,103 vs 47,185).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 110.0 PassMark/$ ($3,521 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 240W vs 105W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 4464P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
EPYC 4464P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,092 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 740.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 110.0 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 240W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 256 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4464P better than EPYC 73F3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 4464P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 73F3
The EPYC 73F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,103 points. Launch price was $3,521.
EPYC 4464P
The EPYC 4464P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,185 points. Launch price was $399.
Processing Power
The EPYC 73F3 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 4464P offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 73F3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 73F3 versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4464P — a 29.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4464P (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 73F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 4464P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 73F3 scores 46,103 against the EPYC 4464P's 47,185 — a 2.3% lead for the EPYC 4464P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 73F3 vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4464P.
| Feature | EPYC 73F3 | EPYC 4464P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 5.4 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+700% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 46,103 | 47,185+2% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 73F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 4464P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 73F3 versus 5200 on the EPYC 4464P — the EPYC 4464P supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 73F3 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 73F3) vs 2 (EPYC 4464P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 73F3) vs 28 (EPYC 4464P) — the EPYC 73F3 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (EPYC 73F3) and AM5,FL1 (EPYC 4464P).
| Feature | EPYC 73F3 | EPYC 4464P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 5200+63% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+3100% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4464P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 73F3) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4464P). The EPYC 4464P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 73F3 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 73F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; EPYC 4464P rivals Core i9-13900.
| Feature | EPYC 73F3 | EPYC 4464P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 73F3 was priced at $3521, while the EPYC 4464P came in at $429. On launch pricing ($3521 vs $429), EPYC 4464P was $3092 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 73F3 delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 110.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 4464P — making the EPYC 4464P the 157.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 73F3 | EPYC 4464P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3521 | $429-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.1 | 110.0+740% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 73F3 and EPYC 4464P
