
EPYC 73F3

Xeon Gold 6444Y
EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon Gold 6444Y Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon Gold 6444Y FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon Gold 6444Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 73F3
2021Why buy it
- ✅+468.9% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 45 MB).
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($3,521 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 240W instead of 270W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6444Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (46,103 vs 47,176).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6444Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 6444Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌2.9% HIGHER MSRP$3,622 MSRPvs$3,521 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6444Y better than EPYC 73F3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon Gold 6444Y Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 73F3
The EPYC 73F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,103 points. Launch price was $3,521.

Xeon Gold 6444Y
The Xeon Gold 6444Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 47,176 points. Launch price was $1,517.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 73F3 and Xeon Gold 6444Y share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 73F3 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6444Y — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 73F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Gold 6444Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 73F3 scores 46,103 against the Xeon Gold 6444Y's 47,176 — a 2.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6444Y. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 73F3 vs 45 MB on the Xeon Gold 6444Y.
| Feature | EPYC 73F3 | Xeon Gold 6444Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+469% | 45 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 46,103 | 47,176+2% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 73F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6444Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 73F3 versus 5600 on the Xeon Gold 6444Y — the Xeon Gold 6444Y supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 73F3) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6444Y) — the EPYC 73F3 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (EPYC 73F3) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6444Y).
| Feature | EPYC 73F3 | Xeon Gold 6444Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 5600+75% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 73F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Xeon Gold 6444Y rivals EPYC 9384X.
| Feature | EPYC 73F3 | Xeon Gold 6444Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 73F3 was priced at $3521, while the Xeon Gold 6444Y came in at $3622. On launch pricing ($3521 vs $3622), EPYC 73F3 was $101 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 73F3 delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 13.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6444Y — making the EPYC 73F3 the 0.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 73F3 | Xeon Gold 6444Y |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3521-3% | $3622 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.1 | 13.0 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















