
EPYC 7452

Xeon Gold 6342
EPYC 7452 vs Xeon Gold 6342 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7452 vs Xeon Gold 6342 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7452 vs Xeon Gold 6342: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7452
2019Why buy it
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Costs $952 less on MSRP ($2,025 MSRP vs $2,977 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.6 vs 15.8 PassMark/$ ($2,025 MSRP vs $2,977 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 155W instead of 230W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6342 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (45,764 vs 47,076).
Xeon Gold 6342
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.8 vs 22.6 PassMark/$ ($2,977 MSRP vs $2,025 MSRP).
- ❌48.4% higher power demand at 230W vs 155W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6342 better than EPYC 7452?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7452 vs Xeon Gold 6342 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7452
The EPYC 7452 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 45,764 points. Launch price was $2,025.

Xeon Gold 6342
The Xeon Gold 6342 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 230 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 47,076 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7452 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6342 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7452 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7452 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6342 — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6342 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 7452 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6342 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7452 scores 45,764 against the Xeon Gold 6342's 47,076 — a 2.8% lead for the Xeon Gold 6342. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7452 vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6342.
| Feature | EPYC 7452 | Xeon Gold 6342 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.35 GHz | 3.5 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+256% | 36 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 45,764 | 47,076+3% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7452 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6342 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 6342 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7452) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6342) — the EPYC 7452 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7452) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6342).
| Feature | EPYC 7452 | Xeon Gold 6342 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 6144+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7452) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6342). Direct competitor: EPYC 7452 rivals Xeon Gold 6248R; Xeon Gold 6342 rivals EPYC 7443.
| Feature | EPYC 7452 | Xeon Gold 6342 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7452 was priced at $2025, while the Xeon Gold 6342 came in at $2977. On launch pricing ($2025 vs $2977), EPYC 7452 was $952 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7452 delivers 22.6 pts/$ vs 15.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6342 — making the EPYC 7452 the 35.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7452 | Xeon Gold 6342 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2025-32% | $2977 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.6+43% | 15.8 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















