EPYC 7452 vs Xeon Gold 6336Y

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7452

32 Cores64 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 6336Y

24 Cores48 Thrd185 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7452 vs Xeon Gold 6336Y Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7452

32 / 64

45,764

+0.5%

Ryzen 5 7400F

Ryzen 9 3900

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Gold 6336Y

24 / 48

45,517

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7452 vs Xeon Gold 6336Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7452 vs Xeon Gold 6336Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7452

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Costs $1,220 less on MSRP ($2,025 MSRP vs $3,245 MSRP).
✅Delivers 61.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.6 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($2,025 MSRP vs $3,245 MSRP).
✅Draws 155W instead of 185W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6336Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon Gold 6336Y

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (45,517 vs 45,764).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 22.6 PassMark/$ ($3,245 MSRP vs $2,025 MSRP).
❌19.4% higher power demand at 185W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7452 better than Xeon Gold 6336Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6336Y is ahead with a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7452 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. EPYC 7452 also has the bigger cache pool with 255.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7452 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 255.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7452 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7452 comes in $1,220 cheaper on MSRP at $2,025 MSRP versus $3,245 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6336Y is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 61.1% better value on MSRP (22.6 vs 14.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6336Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7452 vs Xeon Gold 6336Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7452

The EPYC 7452 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 45,764 points. Launch price was $2,025.

Xeon Gold 6336Y

The Xeon Gold 6336Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 45,517 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7452 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6336Y offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7452 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7452 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6336Y — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6336Y (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7452 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6336Y uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7452 scores 45,764 against the Xeon Gold 6336Y's 45,517 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 7452. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7452 vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6336Y.

Feature	EPYC 7452	Xeon Gold 6336Y
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+33%	24 / 48
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	3.6 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+256%	36 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	45,764	45,517

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7452 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6336Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7452) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6336Y) — the EPYC 7452 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7452) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6336Y).

Feature	EPYC 7452	Xeon Gold 6336Y
Socket	TR4	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7452) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6336Y). Direct competitor: EPYC 7452 rivals Xeon Gold 6248R; Xeon Gold 6336Y rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 7452	Xeon Gold 6336Y
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7452 was priced at $2025, while the Xeon Gold 6336Y came in at $3245. On launch pricing ($2025 vs $3245), EPYC 7452 was $1220 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7452 delivers 22.6 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6336Y — making the EPYC 7452 the 46.8% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7452	Xeon Gold 6336Y
MSRP	$2025-38%	$3245
Performance per Dollar	22.6+61%	14.0
Release Date	2019	2021

Search EPYC 7452 on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6336Y on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.