EPYC 7452 vs Xeon W-3175X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7452

32 Cores64 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon W-3175X

28 Cores56 Thrd255 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7452 vs Xeon W-3175X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7452

32 / 64

45,764

0.0%

Ryzen 5 7400F

Ryzen 9 3900

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon W-3175X

28 / 56

46,125

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7452 vs Xeon W-3175X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7452 vs Xeon W-3175X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7452

2019

Why buy it

✅+232.5% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 39 MB).
✅Costs $974 less on MSRP ($2,025 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 46.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.6 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($2,025 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 155W instead of 255W, a 100W reduction.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3175X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (45,764 vs 46,125).

Xeon W-3175X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (39 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 22.6 PassMark/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $2,025 MSRP).
❌64.5% higher power demand at 255W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3175X better than EPYC 7452?

Yes. Xeon W-3175X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3175X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3175X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3175X is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7452 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon W-3175X comes in 48.1% more expensive on MSRP at $2,999 MSRP versus $2,025 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7452 is also 46.9% better value on MSRP (22.6 vs 15.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7452 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018) and 232.5% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 39 MB). That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7452 vs Xeon W-3175X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7452

The EPYC 7452 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 45,764 points. Launch price was $2,025.

Xeon W-3175X

The Xeon W-3175X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 46,125 points. Launch price was $2,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7452 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon W-3175X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the EPYC 7452 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7452 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon W-3175X — a 12.6% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3175X (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 7452 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon W-3175X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7452 scores 45,764 against the Xeon W-3175X's 46,125 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon W-3175X. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7452 vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3175X.

Feature	EPYC 7452	Xeon W-3175X
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+14%	28 / 56
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	3.8 GHz+13%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.1 GHz+41%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+232%	38.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	45,764	46,125
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	31,350
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,467
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	17,358

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7452 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3175X uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7452 versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-3175X — the EPYC 7452 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7452 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 512 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7452) vs 6 (Xeon W-3175X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7452) vs 48 (Xeon W-3175X) — the EPYC 7452 offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7452) and Intel C621 (Xeon W-3175X).

Feature	EPYC 7452	Xeon W-3175X
Socket	TR4	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	3200+20%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+700%	512 GB
RAM Channels	8+33%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+167%	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon W-3175X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7452) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3175X). Direct competitor: EPYC 7452 rivals Xeon Gold 6248R.

Feature	EPYC 7452	Xeon W-3175X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7452 was priced at $2025, while the Xeon W-3175X came in at $2999. On launch pricing ($2025 vs $2999), EPYC 7452 was $974 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7452 delivers 22.6 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3175X — making the EPYC 7452 the 38% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7452	Xeon W-3175X
MSRP	$2025-32%	$2999
Performance per Dollar	22.6+47%	15.4
Release Date	2019	2018

Search EPYC 7452 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3175X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.