EPYC 7452 vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q

EPYC 7452 vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7452

32 / 64

45,764

0.0%

Ryzen 5 7400F

Ryzen 9 3900

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

38 / 76

46,681

+2.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7452 vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7452 vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7452

2019

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 128 MB vs 57 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
✅Costs $5,694 less on MSRP ($2,025 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Delivers 273.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.6 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($2,025 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Draws 155W instead of 270W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (45,764 vs 46,681).

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

2021

Why buy it

✅+2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (57 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 22.6 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $2,025 MSRP).
❌74.2% higher power demand at 270W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7452 better than Xeon Platinum 8368Q?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 7452 is ahead with a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8368Q pulls ahead with 2% better PassMark. EPYC 7452 also has the bigger cache pool with 124.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 57 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8368Q is the stronger fit. You are getting 2% better PassMark, backed by 38 cores and 76 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7452 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7452 comes in $5,694 cheaper on MSRP at $2,025 MSRP versus $7,719 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8368Q is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2% better PassMark. It is also 273.7% better value on MSRP (22.6 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8368Q makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 38 cores / 76 threads instead of 32/64. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7452 vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7452

The EPYC 7452 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 45,764 points. Launch price was $2,025.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,681 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7452 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7452 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — a 9.9% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 7452 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7452 scores 45,764 against the Xeon Platinum 8368Q's 46,681 — a 2% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7452 vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q.

Feature	EPYC 7452	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	38 / 76+19%
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	3.7 GHz+10%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.6 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+125%	57 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	45,764	46,681+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7452 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7452) and SP3,C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368Q).

Feature	EPYC 7452	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Socket	TR4	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7452) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368Q). Direct competitor: EPYC 7452 rivals Xeon Gold 6248R; Xeon Platinum 8368Q rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

Feature	EPYC 7452	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7452 was priced at $2025, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q came in at $7719. On launch pricing ($2025 vs $7719), EPYC 7452 was $5694 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7452 delivers 22.6 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — making the EPYC 7452 the 115.6% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7452	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP	$2025-74%	$7719
Performance per Dollar	22.6+277%	6.0
Release Date	2019	2021

Search EPYC 7452 on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8368Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.