EPYC 7542 vs Xeon Gold 6336Y

EPYC 7542 vs Xeon Gold 6336Y Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7542

32 / 64

45,359

0.0%

Ryzen 5 8600G

Ryzen 9 8945H

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Gold 6336Y

24 / 48

45,517

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7542 vs Xeon Gold 6336Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7542 vs Xeon Gold 6336Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7542

2019

Why buy it

✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 36 MB).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6336Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (45,359 vs 45,517).
❌
4.8% HIGHER MSRP
$3,400 MSRPvs$3,245 MSRP
❌21.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 185W.

Xeon Gold 6336Y

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $155 less on MSRP ($3,245 MSRP vs $3,400 MSRP).
✅Draws 185W instead of 225W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 128 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6336Y better than EPYC 7542?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6336Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6336Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6336Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6336Y is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 6336Y comes in $155 cheaper on MSRP at $3,245 MSRP versus $3,400 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 5.1% better value on MSRP (14.0 vs 13.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6336Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 32/64. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7542 vs Xeon Gold 6336Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7542

The EPYC 7542 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 45,359 points. Launch price was $3,400.

Xeon Gold 6336Y

The Xeon Gold 6336Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 45,517 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7542 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6336Y offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7542 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7542 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6336Y — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6336Y (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7542 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6336Y uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7542 scores 45,359 against the Xeon Gold 6336Y's 45,517 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6336Y. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7542 vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6336Y.

Feature	EPYC 7542	Xeon Gold 6336Y
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+33%	24 / 48
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.6 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+21%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+256%	36 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	45,359	45,517

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7542 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6336Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7542) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6336Y) — the EPYC 7542 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7542) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6336Y).

Feature	EPYC 7542	Xeon Gold 6336Y
Socket	SP3	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7542) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6336Y). Direct competitor: EPYC 7542 rivals Xeon Gold 6248R; Xeon Gold 6336Y rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 7542	Xeon Gold 6336Y
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7542 was priced at $3400, while the Xeon Gold 6336Y came in at $3245. On launch pricing ($3400 vs $3245), Xeon Gold 6336Y was $155 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7542 delivers 13.3 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6336Y — making the Xeon Gold 6336Y the 5% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7542	Xeon Gold 6336Y
MSRP	$3400	$3245-5%
Performance per Dollar	13.3	14.0+5%
Release Date	2019	2021

Search EPYC 7542 on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6336Y on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.