EPYC 8224P vs Xeon W-3175X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 8224P

24 Cores48 Thrd160 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

EPYC family

····

Buy on Amazon

Xeon W-3175X

28 Cores56 Thrd255 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 8224P vs Xeon W-3175X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8224P

24 / 48

45,421

0.0%

Ryzen 5 8600G

Ryzen 9 8945H

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon W-3175X

28 / 56

46,125

+1.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8224P vs Xeon W-3175X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8224P vs Xeon W-3175X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8224P

2023

Why buy it

✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).
✅Costs $2,144 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 245.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 160W instead of 255W, a 95W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3175X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (45,421 vs 46,125).

Xeon W-3175X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (39 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 53.1 PassMark/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
❌59.4% higher power demand at 255W vs 160W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while EPYC 8224P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3175X better than EPYC 8224P?

Yes. Xeon W-3175X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3175X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3175X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3175X is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 8224P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon W-3175X comes in 250.8% more expensive on MSRP at $2,999 MSRP versus $855 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 8224P is also 245.4% better value on MSRP (53.1 vs 15.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8224P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and 66.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8224P vs Xeon W-3175X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8224P

The EPYC 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,421 points. Launch price was $855.

Xeon W-3175X

The Xeon W-3175X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 46,125 points. Launch price was $2,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8224P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon W-3175X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3175X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8224P versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon W-3175X — a 23.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3175X (base: 2.55 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 8224P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon W-3175X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8224P scores 45,421 against the Xeon W-3175X's 46,125 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon W-3175X. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8224P vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3175X.

Feature	EPYC 8224P	Xeon W-3175X
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	28 / 56+17%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.8 GHz+27%
Base Clock	2.55 GHz	3.1 GHz+22%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+66%	38.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	45,421	46,125+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	31,350
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,467
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	17,358

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8224P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3175X uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8224P versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-3175X — the EPYC 8224P supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8224P supports up to 1152 GB of RAM compared to 512 GB — 125% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8224P) vs 48 (Xeon W-3175X) — the EPYC 8224P offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8224P) and Intel C621 (Xeon W-3175X).

Feature	EPYC 8224P	Xeon W-3175X
Socket	SP6	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+80%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	1152 GB+125%	512 GB
RAM Channels	6	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96+100%	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon W-3175X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 8224P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3175X). Direct competitor: EPYC 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

Feature	EPYC 8224P	Xeon W-3175X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 8224P was priced at $855, while the Xeon W-3175X came in at $2999. On launch pricing ($855 vs $2999), EPYC 8224P was $2144 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8224P delivers 53.1 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3175X — making the EPYC 8224P the 110.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 8224P	Xeon W-3175X
MSRP	$855-71%	$2999
Performance per Dollar	53.1+245%	15.4
Release Date	2023	2018

Search EPYC 8224P on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3175X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.