
EPYC 8224P vs Xeon W-3175X

EPYC 8224P

Xeon W-3175X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 8224P
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3175X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 8224P | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($1,048) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,999) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 8224P | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+182%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($1,048) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,999) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8224P and Xeon W-3175X

EPYC 8224P
The EPYC 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,421 points. Launch price was $855.

Xeon W-3175X
The Xeon W-3175X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 46,125 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8224P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon W-3175X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3175X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8224P versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon W-3175X — a 23.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3175X (base: 2.55 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 8224P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon W-3175X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8224P scores 45,421 against the Xeon W-3175X's 46,125 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon W-3175X. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8224P vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3175X.
| Feature | EPYC 8224P | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 28 / 56+17% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+27% |
| Base Clock | 2.55 GHz | 3.1 GHz+22% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+66% | 38.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 45,421 | 46,125+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 31,350 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,467 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 17,358 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8224P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3175X uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8224P versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-3175X — the EPYC 8224P supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8224P supports up to 1152 of RAM compared to 512 GB — 76.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8224P) vs 48 (Xeon W-3175X) — the EPYC 8224P offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8224P) and Intel C621 (Xeon W-3175X).
| Feature | EPYC 8224P | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+119900% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 | 512 GB+46603278% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 6 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 96+100% | 48 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon W-3175X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 8224P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3175X). Direct competitor: EPYC 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.
| Feature | EPYC 8224P | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 8224P launched at $855 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3175X debuted at $2999. At current prices ($1048 vs $2999), the EPYC 8224P is $1951 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8224P delivers 43.3 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3175X — making the EPYC 8224P the 95.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 8224P | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $855-71% | $2999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1048-65% | $2999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.3+181% | 15.4 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















