Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 8224P

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 73F3

16 Cores32 Thrd240 WWMax: 4 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

EPYC 8224P

24 Cores48 Thrd160 WWMax: 3 GHz2023
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 8224P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 73F3
16 / 32
46,103
+1.5%
brand logoRyzen 7 5800
brand logoRyzen 9 PRO 8945HS
brand logoRyzen 7 7700X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
brand logoRyzen 9 9955HX3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
EPYC 8224P
24 / 48
45,421
0.0%
brand logoRyzen 5 8600G
brand logoRyzen 9 8945H
brand logoRyzen AI 9 HX 370
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 8224P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 73F3
low200 FPS
medium159 FPS
high128 FPS
ultra98 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low157 FPS
medium129 FPS
high108 FPS
ultra86 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 73F3
low510 FPS
medium446 FPS
high357 FPS
ultra290 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low392 FPS
medium348 FPS
high284 FPS
ultra227 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 73F3
low979 FPS
medium819 FPS
high760 FPS
ultra678 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low858 FPS
medium771 FPS
high745 FPS
ultra668 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 73F3
low1146 FPS
medium1015 FPS
high873 FPS
ultra758 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low1018 FPS
medium908 FPS
high770 FPS
ultra647 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 73F3
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 73F3
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 73F3
low306 FPS
medium235 FPS
high212 FPS
ultra191 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low319 FPS
medium244 FPS
high210 FPS
ultra186 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 73F3
low286 FPS
medium257 FPS
high204 FPS
ultra166 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low252 FPS
medium221 FPS
high171 FPS
ultra136 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 73F3
low362 FPS
medium319 FPS
high279 FPS
ultra240 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low309 FPS
medium272 FPS
high250 FPS
ultra200 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 73F3
low244 FPS
medium214 FPS
high183 FPS
ultra170 FPS
1080P
EPYC 8224P
low244 FPS
medium214 FPS
high181 FPS
ultra166 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 8224P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 73F3

2021

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 53.1 PassMark/$ ($3,521 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
  • ❌50% higher power demand at 240W vs 160W.
  • ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 8224P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC 8224P

2023

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $2,666 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 305.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 160W instead of 240W, a 80W reduction.
  • ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 73F3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (45,421 vs 46,103).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 73F3 better than EPYC 8224P?
Yes. EPYC 73F3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 73F3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 256 MB versus 64 MB.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 73F3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 73F3 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 8224P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 73F3 comes in 311.8% more expensive on MSRP at $3,521 MSRP versus $855 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 8224P is also 305.7% better value on MSRP (53.1 vs 13.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 8224P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 8224P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 73F3

The EPYC 73F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,103 points. Launch price was $3,521.

AMD

EPYC 8224P

The EPYC 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,421 points. Launch price was $855.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 73F3 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 8224P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 8224P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 73F3 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 8224P — a 28.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 73F3 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The EPYC 73F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 8224P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 73F3 scores 46,103 against the EPYC 8224P's 45,421 — a 1.5% lead for the EPYC 73F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 73F3 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8224P.

FeatureEPYC 73F3EPYC 8224P
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock
4 GHz+33%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+37%
2.55 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+300%
64 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
7 nm+
5 nm-29%
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark
46,103+2%
45,421
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 73F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 8224P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 73F3 versus 4800 on the EPYC 8224P — the EPYC 8224P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 73F3 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 255.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 73F3) vs 6 (EPYC 8224P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 73F3) vs 96 (EPYC 8224P) — the EPYC 73F3 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (EPYC 73F3) and SP6 (EPYC 8224P).

FeatureEPYC 73F3EPYC 8224P
Socket
SP3
SP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity
4096+256%
1152
RAM Channels
8+33%
6
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+33%
96
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 73F3) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 8224P). Direct competitor: EPYC 73F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; EPYC 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

FeatureEPYC 73F3EPYC 8224P
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 73F3 was priced at $3521, while the EPYC 8224P came in at $855. On launch pricing ($3521 vs $855), EPYC 8224P was $2666 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 73F3 delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 53.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 8224P — making the EPYC 8224P the 120.9% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 73F3EPYC 8224P
MSRP
$3521
$855-76%
Performance per Dollar
13.1
53.1+305%
Release Date
2021
2023
Search EPYC 73F3 on AmazonSearch EPYC 8224P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.