EPYC 7402 vs EPYC 8224P

AMD

EPYC 7402

24 Cores48 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

EPYC 8224P

24 Cores48 Thrd160 WWMax: 3 GHz2023
EPYC family
····

EPYC 7402 vs EPYC 8224P Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7402 vs EPYC 8224P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7402 vs EPYC 8224P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7402

2019

Why buy it

  • +1.3% higher PassMark.
  • 33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 8224P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.8 vs 53.1 PassMark/$ ($1,783 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
  • Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 8224P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC 8224P

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Costs $928 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $1,783 MSRP).
  • Delivers 105.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $1,783 MSRP).
  • Draws 160W instead of 180W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (45,421 vs 46,012).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8224P better than EPYC 7402?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 8224P is ahead with a 11.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7402 pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. EPYC 8224P also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7402 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 8224P is the better buy right now. EPYC 8224P comes in $928 cheaper on MSRP at $855 MSRP versus $1,783 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7402 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.3% better PassMark. It is also 105.9% better value on MSRP (53.1 vs 25.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 8224P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of SP3, 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7402 vs EPYC 8224P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7402

The EPYC 7402 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 46,012 points. Launch price was $1,783.

AMD

EPYC 8224P

The EPYC 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,421 points. Launch price was $855.

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7402 and EPYC 8224P share an identical 24-core/48-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 8224P — a 11% clock advantage for the EPYC 7402 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The EPYC 7402 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 8224P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7402 scores 46,012 against the EPYC 8224P's 45,421 — a 1.3% lead for the EPYC 7402. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7402 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8224P.

FeatureEPYC 7402EPYC 8224P
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
24 / 48
Boost Clock
3.35 GHz+12%
3 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+10%
2.55 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)
64 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
7 nm, 14 nm
5 nm-29%
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark
46,012+1%
45,421
Cinebench R23 Multi
28,546
Geekbench 6 Single
1,299
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,622
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7402 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 8224P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7402 versus 4800 on the EPYC 8224P — the EPYC 8224P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7402 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1152 GB 255.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7402) vs 6 (EPYC 8224P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7402) vs 96 (EPYC 8224P) — the EPYC 7402 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7402) and SP6 (EPYC 8224P).

FeatureEPYC 7402EPYC 8224P
Socket
SP3
SP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+256%
1152 GB
RAM Channels
8+33%
6
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+33%
96
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 8224P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7402) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 8224P). Primary use case: EPYC 7402 targets Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7402 rivals Xeon Gold 6242; EPYC 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

FeatureEPYC 7402EPYC 8224P
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use
Server / Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7402 was priced at $1783, while the EPYC 8224P came in at $855. On launch pricing ($1783 vs $855), EPYC 8224P was $928 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7402 delivers 25.8 pts/$ vs 53.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 8224P — making the EPYC 8224P the 69.2% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7402EPYC 8224P
MSRP
$1783
$855-52%
Performance per Dollar
25.8
53.1+106%
Release Date
2019
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.