EPYC 7402
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
EPYC 7402 vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7402 vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7402 vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7945: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7402
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (28,546 vs 28,905).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.8 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($1,783 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +45.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,374 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $1,783 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 343.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $1,783 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7402, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 better than EPYC 7402?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7402 vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7402
The EPYC 7402 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 46,012 points. Launch price was $1,783.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 46,828 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7402 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7402 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 — a 46.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 7402 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7402 scores 46,012 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945's 46,828 — a 1.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 28,546 vs 28,905 (1.2% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,299 vs 2,206, a 51.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,622 vs 16,832 (28.6% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7402 vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945.
| Feature | EPYC 7402 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+100% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3.35 GHz | 5.4 GHz+61% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.7 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 46,012 | 46,828+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 28,546 | 28,905+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,299 | 2,206+70% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,622 | 16,832+33% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7402 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7402 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7402 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7402) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7402) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945) — the EPYC 7402 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7402) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650,AMD A620 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945).
| Feature | EPYC 7402 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5200+63% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+3100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7402) vs true (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 7402 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7402 targets Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7402 rivals Xeon Gold 6242; Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 rivals Core i9-13900.
| Feature | EPYC 7402 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU | true |
| Target Use | Server / Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7402 was priced at $1783, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 came in at $409. On launch pricing ($1783 vs $409), Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 was $1374 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7402 delivers 25.8 pts/$ vs 114.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 — making the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 the 126.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7402 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1783 | $409-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.8 | 114.5+344% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7402 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
