EPYC 4464P
EPYC 7402
EPYC 4464P vs EPYC 7402 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4464P vs EPYC 7402 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4464P vs EPYC 7402: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4464P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +39.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,354 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $1,783 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 326.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 110.0 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $1,783 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
EPYC 7402
2019Why buy it
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4464P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (46,012 vs 47,185).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.8 vs 110.0 PassMark/$ ($1,783 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 4464P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4464P better than EPYC 7402?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4464P vs EPYC 7402 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4464P
The EPYC 4464P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,185 points. Launch price was $399.
EPYC 7402
The EPYC 7402 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 46,012 points. Launch price was $1,783.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4464P packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 7402 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7402 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4464P versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402 — a 46.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 4464P (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 4464P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 7402 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4464P scores 47,185 against the EPYC 7402's 46,012 — a 2.5% lead for the EPYC 4464P. Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 4464P | EPYC 7402 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 24 / 48+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+61% | 3.35 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+32% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 47,185+3% | 46,012 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 28,546 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,299 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,622 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4464P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7402 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4464P versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7402 — the EPYC 4464P supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7402 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4464P) vs 8 (EPYC 7402). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4464P) vs 128 (EPYC 7402) — the EPYC 7402 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5,FL1 (EPYC 4464P) and SP3,Rome (EPYC 7402).
| Feature | EPYC 4464P | EPYC 7402 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200+63% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4464P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4464P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4464P) vs AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7402). The EPYC 4464P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 7402 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7402 targets Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4464P rivals Core i9-13900; EPYC 7402 rivals Xeon Gold 6242.
| Feature | EPYC 4464P | EPYC 7402 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU |
| Target Use | — | Server / Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4464P was priced at $429, while the EPYC 7402 came in at $1783. On launch pricing ($429 vs $1783), EPYC 4464P was $1354 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4464P delivers 110.0 pts/$ vs 25.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 7402 — making the EPYC 4464P the 124% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4464P | EPYC 7402 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429-76% | $1783 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.0+326% | 25.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4464P and EPYC 7402
