EPYC 7402 vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7402

24 Cores48 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

38 Cores76 Thrd270 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7402 vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7402

24 / 48

46,012

0.0%

Ryzen 7 5800

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

38 / 76

46,681

+1.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7402 vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7402 vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7402

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,936 less on MSRP ($1,783 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Delivers 326.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($1,783 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Draws 180W instead of 270W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8368Q across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (46,012 vs 46,681).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 57 MB).

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+78.1% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 32 MB).
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $1,783 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 270W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8368Q better than EPYC 7402?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8368Q is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 15.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8368Q is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8368Q is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 38 cores and 76 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 78.1% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8368Q is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7402 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Platinum 8368Q comes in 332.9% more expensive on MSRP at $7,719 MSRP versus $1,783 MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7402 is also 326.7% better value on MSRP (25.8 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8368Q makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019), 78.1% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 32 MB), more multi-core headroom with 38 cores / 76 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7402 vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7402

The EPYC 7402 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 46,012 points. Launch price was $1,783.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,681 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7402 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — a 9.9% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 7402 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7402 scores 46,012 against the Xeon Platinum 8368Q's 46,681 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7402 vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q.

Feature	EPYC 7402	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	38 / 76+58%
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	3.7 GHz+10%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+8%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	57 MB (total)+78%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	46,012	46,681+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	28,546	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,299	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	12,622	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7402 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7402) and SP3,C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368Q).

Feature	EPYC 7402	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Socket	SP3	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8368Q supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7402) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368Q). Primary use case: EPYC 7402 targets Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7402 rivals Xeon Gold 6242; Xeon Platinum 8368Q rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

Feature	EPYC 7402	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Server / Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7402 was priced at $1783, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q came in at $7719. On launch pricing ($1783 vs $7719), EPYC 7402 was $5936 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7402 delivers 25.8 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — making the EPYC 7402 the 124.1% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7402	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP	$1783-77%	$7719
Performance per Dollar	25.8+330%	6.0
Release Date	2019	2021

Search EPYC 7402 on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8368Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.