
EPYC 7402

Xeon W-3175X
EPYC 7402 vs Xeon W-3175X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7402 vs Xeon W-3175X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7402 vs Xeon W-3175X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7402
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,216 less on MSRP ($1,783 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($1,783 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 255W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3175X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (28,546 vs 31,350).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 39 MB).
Xeon W-3175X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $1,783 MSRP).
- ❌41.7% higher power demand at 255W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-3175X better than EPYC 7402?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7402 vs Xeon W-3175X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7402
The EPYC 7402 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 46,012 points. Launch price was $1,783.

Xeon W-3175X
The Xeon W-3175X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 46,125 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7402 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon W-3175X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3175X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon W-3175X — a 12.6% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3175X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 7402 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon W-3175X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7402 scores 46,012 against the Xeon W-3175X's 46,125 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon W-3175X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 28,546 vs 31,350 (9.4% advantage for the Xeon W-3175X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,299 vs 1,467, a 12.1% lead for the Xeon W-3175X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,622 vs 17,358 (31.6% advantage for the Xeon W-3175X). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7402 vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3175X.
| Feature | EPYC 7402 | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 28 / 56+17% |
| Boost Clock | 3.35 GHz | 3.8 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.1 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 38.5 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 46,012 | 46,125 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 28,546 | 31,350+10% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,299 | 1,467+13% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,622 | 17,358+38% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7402 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3175X uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7402 versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-3175X — the EPYC 7402 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7402 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 512 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7402) vs 6 (Xeon W-3175X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7402) vs 48 (Xeon W-3175X) — the EPYC 7402 offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7402) and Intel C621 (Xeon W-3175X).
| Feature | EPYC 7402 | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+20% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+700% | 512 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+167% | 48 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon W-3175X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3175X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7402) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3175X). Primary use case: EPYC 7402 targets Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7402 rivals Xeon Gold 6242.
| Feature | EPYC 7402 | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Server / Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7402 was priced at $1783, while the Xeon W-3175X came in at $2999. On launch pricing ($1783 vs $2999), EPYC 7402 was $1216 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7402 delivers 25.8 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3175X — making the EPYC 7402 the 50.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7402 | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1783-41% | $2999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.8+68% | 15.4 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















