EPYC 7402 vs Xeon W-3175X

AMD

EPYC 7402

24 Cores48 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019
EPYC family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon W-3175X

28 Cores56 Thrd255 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 7402 vs Xeon W-3175X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7402 vs Xeon W-3175X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7402 vs Xeon W-3175X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7402

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,216 less on MSRP ($1,783 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 67.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($1,783 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
  • Draws 180W instead of 255W, a 75W reduction.
  • 166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3175X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (28,546 vs 31,350).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 39 MB).

Xeon W-3175X

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +22.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +20.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 32 MB).
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $1,783 MSRP).
  • 41.7% higher power demand at 255W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3175X better than EPYC 7402?
Yes. Xeon W-3175X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 22.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 9.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 0.2% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3175X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 22.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3175X is the stronger fit. You are getting 9.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 20.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 32 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon W-3175X is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7402 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon W-3175X comes in 68.2% more expensive on MSRP at $2,999 MSRP versus $1,783 MSRP, and it still gives you a 22.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7402 is also 67.8% better value on MSRP (25.8 vs 15.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7402 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7402 vs Xeon W-3175X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7402

The EPYC 7402 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 46,012 points. Launch price was $1,783.

Intel

Xeon W-3175X

The Xeon W-3175X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 46,125 points. Launch price was $2,999.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7402 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon W-3175X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3175X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon W-3175X — a 12.6% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3175X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 7402 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon W-3175X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7402 scores 46,012 against the Xeon W-3175X's 46,125 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon W-3175X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 28,546 vs 31,350 (9.4% advantage for the Xeon W-3175X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,299 vs 1,467, a 12.1% lead for the Xeon W-3175X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,622 vs 17,358 (31.6% advantage for the Xeon W-3175X). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7402 vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3175X.

FeatureEPYC 7402Xeon W-3175X
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
28 / 56+17%
Boost Clock
3.35 GHz
3.8 GHz+13%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.1 GHz+11%
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)
38.5 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
7 nm, 14 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
46,012
46,125
Cinebench R23 Multi
28,546
31,350+10%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,299
1,467+13%
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,622
17,358+38%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7402 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3175X uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7402 versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-3175X — the EPYC 7402 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7402 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 512 GB 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7402) vs 6 (Xeon W-3175X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7402) vs 48 (Xeon W-3175X) — the EPYC 7402 offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7402) and Intel C621 (Xeon W-3175X).

FeatureEPYC 7402Xeon W-3175X
Socket
SP3
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200+20%
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+700%
512 GB
RAM Channels
8+33%
6
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+167%
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon W-3175X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3175X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7402) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3175X). Primary use case: EPYC 7402 targets Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7402 rivals Xeon Gold 6242.

FeatureEPYC 7402Xeon W-3175X
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server / Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7402 was priced at $1783, while the Xeon W-3175X came in at $2999. On launch pricing ($1783 vs $2999), EPYC 7402 was $1216 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7402 delivers 25.8 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3175X — making the EPYC 7402 the 50.6% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7402Xeon W-3175X
MSRP
$1783-41%
$2999
Performance per Dollar
25.8+68%
15.4
Release Date
2019
2018

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.