EPYC 7402 vs EPYC 9184X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7402

24 Cores48 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9184X

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2023

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7402 vs EPYC 9184X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7402

24 / 48

46,012

0.0%

Ryzen 7 5800

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

EPYC 9184X

16 / 32

47,665

+3.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7402 vs EPYC 9184X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7402 vs EPYC 9184X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7402

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,145 less on MSRP ($1,783 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
✅Delivers 166.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($1,783 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
✅Draws 180W instead of 320W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9184X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (46,012 vs 47,665).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9184X moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9184X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $1,783 MSRP).
❌77.8% higher power demand at 320W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9184X better than EPYC 7402?

Yes. EPYC 9184X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 19.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9184X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 19.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 768 MB versus 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9184X is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 2300% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9184X is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7402 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9184X comes in 176.4% more expensive on MSRP at $4,928 MSRP versus $1,783 MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7402 is also 166.8% better value on MSRP (25.8 vs 9.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9184X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 768 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7402 vs EPYC 9184X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7402

The EPYC 7402 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 46,012 points. Launch price was $1,783.

EPYC 9184X

The EPYC 9184X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,665 points. Launch price was $4,928.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7402 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 9184X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7402 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402 versus 4.2 GHz on the EPYC 9184X — a 22.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9184X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.55 GHz). The EPYC 7402 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 9184X uses Genoa-X (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7402 scores 46,012 against the EPYC 9184X's 47,665 — a 3.5% lead for the EPYC 9184X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7402 vs 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9184X.

Feature	EPYC 7402	EPYC 9184X
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+50%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	4.2 GHz+25%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.55 GHz+27%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	768 MB (total)+2300%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Genoa-X (2023)
PassMark	46,012	47,665+4%
Cinebench R23 Multi	28,546	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,299	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	12,622	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7402 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9184X uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7402 versus 4800 on the EPYC 9184X — the EPYC 9184X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9184X supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7402) vs 12 (EPYC 9184X). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7402) and SP5 (EPYC 9184X).

Feature	EPYC 7402	EPYC 9184X
Socket	SP3	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	6144 GB+50%
RAM Channels	8	12+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9184X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7402) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9184X). Primary use case: EPYC 7402 targets Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7402 rivals Xeon Gold 6242; EPYC 9184X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X.

Feature	EPYC 7402	EPYC 9184X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use	Server / Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7402 was priced at $1783, while the EPYC 9184X came in at $4928. On launch pricing ($1783 vs $4928), EPYC 7402 was $3145 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7402 delivers 25.8 pts/$ vs 9.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9184X — making the EPYC 7402 the 90.9% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7402	EPYC 9184X
MSRP	$1783-64%	$4928
Performance per Dollar	25.8+166%	9.7
Release Date	2019	2023

Search EPYC 7402 on Amazon

Search EPYC 9184X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.