EPYC 8224P vs Xeon Gold 6336Y

CPU

GPU

EPYC 8224P

24 Cores48 Thrd160 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

EPYC family

····

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 6336Y

24 Cores48 Thrd185 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 8224P vs Xeon Gold 6336Y Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8224P

24 / 48

45,421

0.0%

Ryzen 5 8600G

Ryzen 9 8945H

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Gold 6336Y

24 / 48

45,517

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8224P vs Xeon Gold 6336Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8224P vs Xeon Gold 6336Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8224P

2023

Why buy it

✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Costs $2,390 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $3,245 MSRP).
✅Delivers 278.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $3,245 MSRP).
✅Draws 160W instead of 185W, a 25W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6336Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (45,421 vs 45,517).

Xeon Gold 6336Y

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 53.1 PassMark/$ ($3,245 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
❌15.6% higher power demand at 185W vs 160W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 8224P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6336Y better than EPYC 8224P?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6336Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6336Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6336Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6336Y is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 8224P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 6336Y comes in 279.5% more expensive on MSRP at $3,245 MSRP versus $855 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 8224P is also 278.7% better value on MSRP (53.1 vs 14.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8224P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8224P vs Xeon Gold 6336Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8224P

The EPYC 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,421 points. Launch price was $855.

Xeon Gold 6336Y

The Xeon Gold 6336Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 45,517 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 8224P and Xeon Gold 6336Y share an identical 24-core/48-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8224P versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6336Y — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6336Y (base: 2.55 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 8224P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6336Y uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8224P scores 45,421 against the Xeon Gold 6336Y's 45,517 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6336Y. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8224P vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6336Y.

Feature	EPYC 8224P	Xeon Gold 6336Y
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	24 / 48
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.6 GHz+20%
Base Clock	2.55 GHz+6%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+78%	36 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	45,421	45,517

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8224P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6336Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8224P versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6336Y — the EPYC 8224P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6336Y supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 255.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8224P) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6336Y). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8224P) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6336Y) — the EPYC 8224P offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8224P) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6336Y).

Feature	EPYC 8224P	Xeon Gold 6336Y
Socket	SP6	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+50%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	1152	4096+256%
RAM Channels	6	8+33%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96+50%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 8224P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6336Y). Direct competitor: EPYC 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Xeon Gold 6336Y rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 8224P	Xeon Gold 6336Y
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 8224P was priced at $855, while the Xeon Gold 6336Y came in at $3245. On launch pricing ($855 vs $3245), EPYC 8224P was $2390 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8224P delivers 53.1 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6336Y — making the EPYC 8224P the 116.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 8224P	Xeon Gold 6336Y
MSRP	$855-74%	$3245
Performance per Dollar	53.1+279%	14.0
Release Date	2023	2021

Search EPYC 8224P on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6336Y on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.