EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon Gold 5418Y

CPU

GPU

EPYC 73F3

16 Cores32 Thrd240 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 5418Y

24 Cores48 Thrd185 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon Gold 5418Y Performance Spectrum

EPYC 73F3

16 / 32

46,103

+1.0%

Ryzen 7 5800

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Gold 5418Y

24 / 48

45,660

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon Gold 5418Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon Gold 5418Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 73F3

2021

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 256 MB vs 45 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 30.8 PassMark/$ ($3,521 MSRP vs $1,483 MSRP).
❌29.7% higher power demand at 240W vs 185W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5418Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Gold 5418Y

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,038 less on MSRP ($1,483 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
✅Delivers 135.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($1,483 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
✅Draws 185W instead of 240W, a 55W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (45 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark (45,660 vs 46,103).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 73F3 better than Xeon Gold 5418Y?

Yes. EPYC 73F3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 73F3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 256 MB versus 45 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 73F3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 468.9% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 45 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 73F3 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 5418Y is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 73F3 comes in 137.4% more expensive on MSRP at $3,521 MSRP versus $1,483 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 5418Y is also 135.1% better value on MSRP (30.8 vs 13.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 5418Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon Gold 5418Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 73F3

The EPYC 73F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,103 points. Launch price was $3,521.

Xeon Gold 5418Y

The Xeon Gold 5418Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 45,660 points. Launch price was $1,493.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 73F3 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5418Y offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 5418Y has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 73F3 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5418Y — a 5.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 73F3 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 73F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Gold 5418Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 73F3 scores 46,103 against the Xeon Gold 5418Y's 45,660 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 73F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 73F3 vs 45 MB on the Xeon Gold 5418Y.

Feature	EPYC 73F3	Xeon Gold 5418Y
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+5%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+75%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+469%	45 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm+	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	46,103	45,660

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 73F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5418Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 73F3 versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 5418Y — the Xeon Gold 5418Y supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 73F3) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5418Y) — the EPYC 73F3 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (EPYC 73F3) and C741 (Xeon Gold 5418Y).

Feature	EPYC 73F3	Xeon Gold 5418Y
Socket	SP3	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 73F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Xeon Gold 5418Y rivals EPYC 9334.

Feature	EPYC 73F3	Xeon Gold 5418Y
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 73F3 was priced at $3521, while the Xeon Gold 5418Y came in at $1483. On launch pricing ($3521 vs $1483), Xeon Gold 5418Y was $2038 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 73F3 delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 30.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5418Y — making the Xeon Gold 5418Y the 80.6% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 73F3	Xeon Gold 5418Y
MSRP	$3521	$1483-58%
Performance per Dollar	13.1	30.8+135%
Release Date	2021	2023

Search EPYC 73F3 on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 5418Y on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.