PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6240R vs Xeon Silver 4316 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6240R vs Xeon Silver 4316: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6240R

2020

Why buy it

✅+3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,212 vs 1,621).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 28.9 PassMark/$ ($2,444 MSRP vs $1,126 MSRP).

Xeon Silver 4316

2021

Why buy it

✅+33.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $1,318 less on MSRP ($1,126 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
✅Delivers 111.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.9 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($1,126 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
✅Draws 150W instead of 165W, a 15W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,846 vs 22,500).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4316 better than Xeon Gold 6240R?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Silver 4316 is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6240R pulls ahead with 3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6240R is the stronger fit. You are getting 3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Silver 4316 is the better buy right now. Xeon Silver 4316 comes in $1,318 cheaper on MSRP at $1,126 MSRP versus $2,444 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6240R is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 111.9% better value on MSRP (28.9 vs 13.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4316 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon Gold 6240R vs Xeon Silver 4316 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6240R

The Xeon Gold 6240R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,353 points. Launch price was $2,200.

Xeon Silver 4316

The Xeon Silver 4316 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 32,556 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6240R packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4316 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6240R has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6240R versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4316 — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6240R uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4316 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6240R scores 33,353 against the Xeon Silver 4316's 32,556 — a 2.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 6240R. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 22,500 vs 21,846 (2.9% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,212 vs 1,621, a 28.9% lead for the Xeon Silver 4316 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 17,218 vs 13,010 (27.8% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R). L3 cache: 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6240R vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4316.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6240R	Xeon Silver 4316
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+20%	20 / 40
Boost Clock	4 GHz+18%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+4%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	35.75 MB+19%	30 MB (total)
L2 Cache	24 MB+2300%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	33,353+2%	32,556
Cinebench R23 Multi	22,500+3%	21,846
Geekbench 6 Single	1,212	1,621+34%
Geekbench 6 Multi	17,218+32%	13,010

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 6240R uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4316 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6240R versus DDR4-2667 on the Xeon Silver 4316 — the Xeon Gold 6240R supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4316 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Gold 6240R) vs 8 (Xeon Silver 4316). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6240R) vs 64 (Xeon Silver 4316) — the Xeon Silver 4316 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Gold 6240R) and C620 (Xeon Silver 4316).

Feature	Xeon Gold 6240R	Xeon Silver 4316
Socket	LGA3647	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933+10%	DDR4-2667
Max RAM Capacity	1024 GB	6144 GB+500%
RAM Channels	6	8+33%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	48	64+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6240R targets Server / High-load computing, Xeon Silver 4316 targets Budget Server / Virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6240R rivals EPYC 7402; Xeon Silver 4316 rivals EPYC 7313.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6240R	Xeon Silver 4316
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Server / High-load computing	Budget Server / Virtualization

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Gold 6240R was priced at $2444, while the Xeon Silver 4316 came in at $1126. On launch pricing ($2444 vs $1126), Xeon Silver 4316 was $1318 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6240R delivers 13.6 pts/$ vs 28.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Silver 4316 — making the Xeon Silver 4316 the 71.7% better value option.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6240R	Xeon Silver 4316
MSRP	$2444	$1126-54%
Performance per Dollar	13.6	28.9+113%
Release Date	2020	2021

Search Xeon Gold 6240R on Amazon

Search Xeon Silver 4316 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.