Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs Xeon Gold 6240R

CPU

GPU

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

12 Cores24 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Threadripper Pro family

··

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 6240R

24 Cores48 Thrd165 WWMax: 4 GHz2020

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs Xeon Gold 6240R Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

12 / 24

33,455

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon Gold 6240R

24 / 48

33,353

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs Xeon Gold 6240R FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs Xeon Gold 6240R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+79% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Costs $1,295 less on MSRP ($1,149 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
✅Delivers 113.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.1 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 22,500).
❌69.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 165W.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6240R

2020

Why buy it

✅+21.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Draws 165W instead of 280W, a 115W reduction.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 29.1 PassMark/$ ($2,444 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6240R better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is ahead with a 16.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6240R pulls ahead with 21.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX also has the bigger cache pool with 79% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6240R is the stronger fit. You are getting 21.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6240R is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 6240R comes in 112.7% more expensive on MSRP at $2,444 MSRP versus $1,149 MSRP, and it still gives you 21.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 16.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is also 113.4% better value on MSRP (29.1 vs 13.6 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6240R makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 12/24 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs Xeon Gold 6240R Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 33,455 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Gold 6240R

The Xeon Gold 6240R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,353 points. Launch price was $2,200.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6240R offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6240R has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6240R — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX (base: 4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses the Castle Peak (2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6240R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX scores 33,455 against the Xeon Gold 6240R's 33,353 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,500 vs 22,500 (19.5% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,652 vs 1,212, a 30.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,500 vs 17,218 (39.8% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6240R.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX	Xeon Gold 6240R
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	24 / 48+100%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+7%	4 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+67%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB+79%	35.75 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	24 MB+4700%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Castle Peak (2020)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	33,455	33,353
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,500	22,500+22%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,652+36%	1,212
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,500	17,218+50%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6240R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6240R — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6240R). PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6240R) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Gold 6240R).

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX	Xeon Gold 6240R
Socket	sWRX8	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+9%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB+100%	1024 GB
RAM Channels	8+33%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+167%	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6240R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6240R). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX targets Professional Workstation, Xeon Gold 6240R targets Server / High-load computing. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX rivals Xeon w5-2455X; Xeon Gold 6240R rivals EPYC 7402.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX	Xeon Gold 6240R
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Professional Workstation	Server / High-load computing

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX was priced at $1149, while the Xeon Gold 6240R came in at $2444. On launch pricing ($1149 vs $2444), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX was $1295 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX delivers 29.1 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6240R — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX the 72.4% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX	Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP	$1149-53%	$2444
Performance per Dollar	29.1+114%	13.6
Release Date	2020	2020

Search Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6240R on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.