Core i7-13700E vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

CPU

GPU

Core i7-13700E

16 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

12 Cores24 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Threadripper Pro family

··

Buy on Amazon

Core i7-13700E vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX Performance Spectrum

Core i7-13700E

16 / 24

33,824

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

12 / 24

33,455

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700E vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700E vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700E

2023

Why buy it

✅+33.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Costs $759 less on MSRP ($390 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 197.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.7 vs 29.1 PassMark/$ ($390 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 24,775).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.1 vs 86.7 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700E better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700E is the stronger fit. You are getting 33.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700E is the better buy right now. Core i7-13700E comes in $759 cheaper on MSRP at $390 MSRP versus $1,149 MSRP, and it still gives you 33.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 197.9% better value on MSRP (86.7 vs 29.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 12/24. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700E vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700E

The Core i7-13700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,824 points. Launch price was $499.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 33,455 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700E packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700E has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i7-13700E versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX — a 17% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700E (base: 1.9 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i7-13700E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses Castle Peak (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700E scores 33,824 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX's 33,455 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-13700E. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 24,775 vs 18,500 (29% advantage for the Core i7-13700E). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,118 vs 1,652, a 24.7% lead for the Core i7-13700E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,711 vs 11,500 (24.5% advantage for the Core i7-13700E). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700E vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.

Feature	Core i7-13700E	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+33%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+19%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	4 GHz+111%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	64 MB+113%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-30%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Castle Peak (2020)
PassMark	33,824+1%	33,455
Cinebench R23 Multi	24,775+34%	18,500
Geekbench 6 Single	2,118+28%	1,652
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,711+28%	11,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-13700E versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX — the Core i7-13700E supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700E) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700E) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610E,Q670E,R680E,W680 (Core i7-13700E) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX).

Feature	Core i7-13700E	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Socket	LGA1700	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200+75%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	2048 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13700E) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). The Core i7-13700E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700E targets Embedded Workstation, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700E rivals Ryzen 7 7700; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX rivals Xeon w5-2455X.

Feature	Core i7-13700E	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V
Target Use	Embedded Workstation	Professional Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13700E was priced at $390, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX came in at $1149. On launch pricing ($390 vs $1149), Core i7-13700E was $759 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700E delivers 86.7 pts/$ vs 29.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX — making the Core i7-13700E the 99.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-13700E	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
MSRP	$390-66%	$1149
Performance per Dollar	86.7+198%	29.1
Release Date	2023	2020

Search Core i7-13700E on Amazon

Search Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.