
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

Xeon w3-2535
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs Xeon w3-2535 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs Xeon w3-2535 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs Xeon w3-2535: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
2020Why buy it
- β +5.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- β +143.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 26 MB).
- β 100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,652 vs 2,254).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 29.1 vs 45.2 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- β51.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 185W.
- βOlder platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon w3-2535 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w3-2535
2024Why buy it
- β +36.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- β Costs $410 less on MSRP ($739 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- β Delivers 55.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.2 vs 29.1 PassMark/$ ($739 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- β Draws 185W instead of 280W, a 95W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,500 vs 18,500).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (26 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w3-2535 better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs Xeon w3-2535 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 33,455 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon w3-2535
The Xeon w3-2535 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023β2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 33,367 points. Launch price was $739.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon w3-2535 offers 10 cores / 20 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon w3-2535 β a 6.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w3-2535 (base: 4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses the Castle Peak (2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w3-2535 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023β2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX scores 33,455 against the Xeon w3-2535's 33,367 β a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,500 vs 17,500 (5.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 1,652 vs 2,254, a 30.8% lead for the Xeon w3-2535 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,500 vs 12,400 (7.5% advantage for the Xeon w3-2535). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon w3-2535.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | Xeon w3-2535 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+20% | 10 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.6 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+14% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+144% | 26.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Castle Peak (2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023β2024) |
| PassMark | 33,455 | 33,367 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,500+6% | 17,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,652 | 2,254+36% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,500 | 12,400+8% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w3-2535 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX versus DDR5-4400 on the Xeon w3-2535 β the Xeon w3-2535 supports 37.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 2048 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX) vs 4 (Xeon w3-2535). PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX) vs 64 (Xeon w3-2535) β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX) and W790 (Xeon w3-2535).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | Xeon w3-2535 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4400+38% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+100% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w3-2535 supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon w3-2535). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX targets Professional Workstation, Xeon w3-2535 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX rivals Xeon w5-2455X; Xeon w3-2535 rivals EPYC 7313.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | Xeon w3-2535 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Professional Workstation | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX was priced at $1149, while the Xeon w3-2535 came in at $739. On launch pricing ($1149 vs $739), Xeon w3-2535 was $410 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX delivers 29.1 pts/$ vs 45.2 pts/$ for the Xeon w3-2535 β making the Xeon w3-2535 the 43.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | Xeon w3-2535 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1149 | $739-36% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.1 | 45.2+55% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














