
Xeon Gold 6244

Xeon W-1350
Xeon Gold 6244 vs Xeon W-1350 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Gold 6244 vs Xeon W-1350 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Gold 6244 vs Xeon W-1350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Gold 6244
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,609 vs 18,742).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 80W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon W-1350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Xeon W-1350.
Xeon W-1350
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 150W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics P750, while Xeon Gold 6244 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 6244.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6244 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $255 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6244 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-1350 better than Xeon Gold 6244?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6244 vs Xeon W-1350 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6244
The Xeon Gold 6244 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 18,609 points. Launch price was $2,925.

Xeon W-1350
The Xeon W-1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,742 points. Launch price was $255.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6244 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-1350 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon Gold 6244 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6244 versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-1350 — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1350 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6244 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-1350 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6244 scores 18,609 against the Xeon W-1350's 18,742 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W-1350. L3 cache: 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6244 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1350.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6244 | Xeon W-1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24.75 MB+106% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+1500% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Rocket Lake-S (2021) |
| PassMark | 18,609 | 18,742 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,140 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,104 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6244 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1350 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2933 on the Xeon Gold 6244 versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-1350 — the Xeon W-1350 supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6244 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Gold 6244) vs 2 (Xeon W-1350). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6244) vs 20 (Xeon W-1350) — the Xeon Gold 6244 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Gold 6244) and W580,C252,C256 (Xeon W-1350).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6244 | Xeon W-1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | 2933 | DDR4-3200+9% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB+700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48+140% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6244) vs Yes (Xeon W-1350). The Xeon W-1350 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics P750), while the Xeon Gold 6244 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6244 rivals EPYC 7262.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6244 | Xeon W-1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | UHD Graphics P750 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













