Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Xeon Gold 6244

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Xeon Gold 6244 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 9 4900HS

8 / 16

18,793

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 6244

8 / 16

18,609

0.0%

Core i7-9750HF

Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Xeon Gold 6244 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Xeon Gold 6244: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 9 4900HS

2020

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Vega 8, while Xeon Gold 6244 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6244 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6244, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Gold 6244

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+209.4% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 8.
✅500% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,609 vs 18,793).
❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 4900HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 4900HS better than Xeon Gold 6244?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6244 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 4900HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 4900HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 4900HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 9 4900HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 4900HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Xeon Gold 6244 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 9 4900HS

The Ryzen 9 4900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 18,793 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6244

The Xeon Gold 6244 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 18,609 points. Launch price was $2,925.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 9 4900HS and Xeon Gold 6244 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900HS versus 4.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6244 — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6244 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 9 4900HS uses the Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6244 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 4900HS scores 18,793 against the Xeon Gold 6244's 18,609 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 9 4900HS. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900HS vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6244.

Feature	Ryzen 9 4900HS	Xeon Gold 6244
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.4 GHz+2%
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.6 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	24.75 MB+209%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	8 MB+1500%
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Renoir (Zen 2) (2020)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	18,793	18,609

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 4900HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6244 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4-4266 on the Ryzen 9 4900HS versus 2933 on the Xeon Gold 6244 — the Ryzen 9 4900HS supports 45.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6244 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 4900HS) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6244). PCIe lanes: 8 (Ryzen 9 4900HS) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6244) — the Xeon Gold 6244 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Ryzen 9 4900HS	Xeon Gold 6244
Socket	FP6	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4-4266+45%	2933
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	1024 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	48+500%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6244 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 4900HS) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6244). The Ryzen 9 4900HS includes integrated graphics (Vega 8), while the Xeon Gold 6244 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 4900HS targets Mobile High-End. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6244 rivals EPYC 7262.