Xeon Gold 6248R vs Xeon W-3265M

Intel

Xeon Gold 6248R

24 Cores48 Thrd205 WWMax: 4 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon W-3265M

24 Cores48 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······

Xeon Gold 6248R vs Xeon W-3265M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6248R vs Xeon W-3265M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6248R vs Xeon W-3265M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6248R

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $3,600 less on MSRP ($2,700 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 132.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($2,700 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3265M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (35,434 vs 35,506).

Xeon W-3265M

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +10.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $2,700 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3265M better than Xeon Gold 6248R?
Yes. Xeon W-3265M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3265M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3265M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon W-3265M is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6248R is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon W-3265M comes in 133.3% more expensive on MSRP at $6,300 MSRP versus $2,700 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 6248R is also 132.9% better value on MSRP (13.1 vs 5.6 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6248R makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon Gold 6248R vs Xeon W-3265M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6248R

The Xeon Gold 6248R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,434 points. Launch price was $2,700.

Intel

Xeon W-3265M

The Xeon W-3265M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,506 points. Launch price was $6,353.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon Gold 6248R and Xeon W-3265M share an identical 24-core/48-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6248R versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265M — a 14% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3265M (base: 3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). Both are built on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6248R scores 35,434 against the Xeon W-3265M's 35,506 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon W-3265M. L3 cache: 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6248R vs 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265M.

FeatureXeon Gold 6248RXeon W-3265M
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
24 / 48
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4.6 GHz+15%
Base Clock
3 GHz+11%
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
35.75 MB+8%
33 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB
24 MB
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
35,434
35,506
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to 2933 memory speed. Both support up to 1024 of RAM. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6248R) vs 64 (Xeon W-3265M) — the Xeon W-3265M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Gold 6248R) and C620 (Xeon W-3265M).

FeatureXeon Gold 6248RXeon W-3265M
Socket
LGA3647
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
2933
2933
Max RAM Capacity
1024
1024
RAM Channels
6
6
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
48
64+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6248R rivals EPYC 7402; Xeon W-3265M rivals EPYC 7402.

FeatureXeon Gold 6248RXeon W-3265M
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Gold 6248R was priced at $2700, while the Xeon W-3265M came in at $6300. On launch pricing ($2700 vs $6300), Xeon Gold 6248R was $3600 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6248R delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3265M — making the Xeon Gold 6248R the 79.8% better value option.

FeatureXeon Gold 6248RXeon W-3265M
MSRP
$2700-57%
$6300
Performance per Dollar
13.1+134%
5.6
Release Date
2020
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.