
Xeon Gold 6258R

Xeon W-3275M
Xeon Gold 6258R vs Xeon W-3275M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Gold 6258R vs Xeon W-3275M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Gold 6258R vs Xeon W-3275M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Gold 6258R
2020Why buy it
- β +0.1% higher PassMark.
- β Costs $499 less on MSRP ($3,950 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
- β Delivers 12.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.2 vs 9.1 PassMark/$ ($3,950 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3275M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Xeon W-3275M
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (40,419 vs 40,442).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 10.2 PassMark/$ ($4,449 MSRP vs $3,950 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6258R better than Xeon W-3275M?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6258R vs Xeon W-3275M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6258R
The Xeon Gold 6258R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019β2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 40,442 points. Launch price was $3,950.

Xeon W-3275M
The Xeon W-3275M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019β2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 40,419 points. Launch price was $7,453.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon W-3275M share an identical 28-core/56-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6258R versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275M β a 14% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3275M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). Both are built on the Cascade Lake (2019β2020) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6258R scores 40,442 against the Xeon W-3275M's 40,419 β a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6258R. Both processors carry 38.5 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6258R | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 28 / 56 | 28 / 56 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.6 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+8% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 38.5 MB | 38.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 28 MB | 28 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019β2020) | Cascade Lake (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 40,442 | 40,419 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to 2933 memory speed. The Xeon W-3275M supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 1024 β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6258R) vs 64 (Xeon W-3275M) β the Xeon W-3275M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA3647 (Xeon Gold 6258R) and C620 (Xeon W-3275M).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6258R | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2933 | 2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 | 2048+100% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 64+33% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6258R rivals EPYC 7502; Xeon W-3275M rivals EPYC 7742.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6258R | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon Gold 6258R was priced at $3950, while the Xeon W-3275M came in at $4449. On launch pricing ($3950 vs $4449), Xeon Gold 6258R was $499 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6258R delivers 10.2 pts/$ vs 9.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3275M β making the Xeon Gold 6258R the 11.9% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6258R | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3950-11% | $4449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.2+12% | 9.1 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















