EPYC 7313P vs Xeon Gold 6258R

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7313P

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2021

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 6258R

28 Cores56 Thrd205 WWMax: 4 GHz2020

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7313P vs Xeon Gold 6258R Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7313P

16 / 32

41,017

+1.4%

Ryzen 7 6800H

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Gold 6258R

28 / 56

40,442

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7313P vs Xeon Gold 6258R FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7313P vs Xeon Gold 6258R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7313P

2021

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅+232.5% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 39 MB).
✅Costs $3,037 less on MSRP ($913 MSRP vs $3,950 MSRP).
✅Delivers 338.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 10.2 PassMark/$ ($913 MSRP vs $3,950 MSRP).
✅Draws 155W instead of 205W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6258R across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon Gold 6258R

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (40,442 vs 41,017).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (39 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.2 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($3,950 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).
❌32.3% higher power demand at 205W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7313P better than Xeon Gold 6258R?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6258R is ahead with a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7313P pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark. EPYC 7313P also has the bigger cache pool with 232.5% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 39 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7313P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 232.5% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 39 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7313P is the better buy right now. EPYC 7313P comes in $3,037 cheaper on MSRP at $913 MSRP versus $3,950 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6258R is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 338.8% better value on MSRP (44.9 vs 10.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7313P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020), 232.5% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 39 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 28/56. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7313P vs Xeon Gold 6258R Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7313P

The EPYC 7313P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,017 points. Launch price was $913.

Xeon Gold 6258R

The Xeon Gold 6258R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 40,442 points. Launch price was $3,950.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7313P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6258R offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 6258R has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6258R — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6258R (base: 3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 7313P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Gold 6258R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7313P scores 41,017 against the Xeon Gold 6258R's 40,442 — a 1.4% lead for the EPYC 7313P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313P vs 38.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6258R.

Feature	EPYC 7313P	Xeon Gold 6258R
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	28 / 56+75%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4 GHz+8%
Base Clock	3 GHz+11%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+232%	38.5 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	28 MB+5500%
Process	7 nm+-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	41,017+1%	40,442

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7313P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6258R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7313P versus 2933 on the Xeon Gold 6258R — the EPYC 7313P supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7313P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1024 — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7313P) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6258R). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7313P) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6258R) — the EPYC 7313P offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7313P) and LGA3647 (Xeon Gold 6258R).

Feature	EPYC 7313P	Xeon Gold 6258R
Socket	SP3	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	3200+9%	2933
Max RAM Capacity	4096+300%	1024
RAM Channels	8+33%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+167%	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7313P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6258R). Direct competitor: EPYC 7313P rivals Xeon Gold 6334; Xeon Gold 6258R rivals EPYC 7502.

Feature	EPYC 7313P	Xeon Gold 6258R
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7313P was priced at $913, while the Xeon Gold 6258R came in at $3950. On launch pricing ($913 vs $3950), EPYC 7313P was $3037 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7313P delivers 44.9 pts/$ vs 10.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6258R — making the EPYC 7313P the 125.8% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7313P	Xeon Gold 6258R
MSRP	$913-77%	$3950
Performance per Dollar	44.9+340%	10.2
Release Date	2021	2020

Search EPYC 7313P on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6258R on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.