
EPYC 7313P

Ryzen 7 8840HX
EPYC 7313P vs Ryzen 7 8840HX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7313P vs Ryzen 7 8840HX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7313P vs Ryzen 7 8840HX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7313P
2021Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8840HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (41,017 vs 42,275).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $913 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌181.8% higher power demand at 155W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8840HX moves to FL1 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 8840HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 155W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 780M, while EPYC 7313P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7313P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 8840HX better than EPYC 7313P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7313P vs Ryzen 7 8840HX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7313P
The EPYC 7313P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,017 points. Launch price was $913.


Ryzen 7 8840HX
The Ryzen 7 8840HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 April 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 42,275 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7313P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8840HX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7313P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313P versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HX — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840HX (base: 3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 7313P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen 7 8840HX uses Dragon Range (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7313P scores 41,017 against the Ryzen 7 8840HX's 42,275 — a 3% lead for the Ryzen 7 8840HX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313P vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HX.
| Feature | EPYC 7313P | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz+38% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+3% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+100% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Dragon Range (2025) |
| PassMark | 41,017 | 42,275+3% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7313P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7313P versus 5600 on the Ryzen 7 8840HX — the Ryzen 7 8840HX supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7313P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 64 — 6300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7313P) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 8840HX). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7313P) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 8840HX) — the EPYC 7313P offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7313P) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 7 8840HX).
| Feature | EPYC 7313P | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 5600+75% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+6300% | 64 |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen 7 8840HX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 780M), while the EPYC 7313P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7313P rivals Xeon Gold 6334; Ryzen 7 8840HX rivals Core i7-13700H.
| Feature | EPYC 7313P | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













