EPYC 7313P vs Xeon Gold 6338N

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7313P

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2021

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 6338N

32 Cores64 Thrd185 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7313P vs Xeon Gold 6338N Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7313P

16 / 32

41,017

0.0%

Ryzen 7 6800H

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Gold 6338N

32 / 64

42,086

+2.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7313P vs Xeon Gold 6338N FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7313P vs Xeon Gold 6338N: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7313P

2021

Why buy it

✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 48 MB).
✅Costs $2,287 less on MSRP ($913 MSRP vs $3,200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 241.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($913 MSRP vs $3,200 MSRP).
✅Draws 155W instead of 185W, a 30W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6338N across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (41,017 vs 42,086).

Xeon Gold 6338N

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($3,200 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).
❌19.4% higher power demand at 185W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6338N better than EPYC 7313P?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6338N is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6338N is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6338N is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6338N is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7313P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 6338N comes in 250.5% more expensive on MSRP at $3,200 MSRP versus $913 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7313P is also 241.6% better value on MSRP (44.9 vs 13.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6338N makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7313P vs Xeon Gold 6338N Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7313P

The EPYC 7313P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,017 points. Launch price was $913.

Xeon Gold 6338N

The Xeon Gold 6338N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 42,086 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7313P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6338N offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6338N has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313P versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6338N — a 5.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 7313P (base: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7313P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Gold 6338N uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7313P scores 41,017 against the Xeon Gold 6338N's 42,086 — a 2.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 6338N. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313P vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6338N.

Feature	EPYC 7313P	Xeon Gold 6338N
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	32 / 64+100%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+6%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+36%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+167%	48 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm+-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	41,017	42,086+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7313P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6338N uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7313P versus 2667 on the Xeon Gold 6338N — the EPYC 7313P supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6338N supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7313P) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6338N) — the EPYC 7313P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7313P) and LGA4189 (Xeon Gold 6338N).

Feature	EPYC 7313P	Xeon Gold 6338N
Socket	SP3	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200+20%	2667
Max RAM Capacity	4096	6144+50%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7313P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6338N). Direct competitor: EPYC 7313P rivals Xeon Gold 6334; Xeon Gold 6338N rivals EPYC 7513.

Feature	EPYC 7313P	Xeon Gold 6338N
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7313P was priced at $913, while the Xeon Gold 6338N came in at $3200. On launch pricing ($913 vs $3200), EPYC 7313P was $2287 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7313P delivers 44.9 pts/$ vs 13.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6338N — making the EPYC 7313P the 109.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7313P	Xeon Gold 6338N
MSRP	$913-71%	$3200
Performance per Dollar	44.9+240%	13.2
Release Date	2021	2021

Search EPYC 7313P on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6338N on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.