
EPYC 7313P

Xeon Gold 6330
EPYC 7313P vs Xeon Gold 6330 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7313P vs Xeon Gold 6330 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7313P vs Xeon Gold 6330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7313P
2021Why buy it
- ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 128 MB vs 42 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
- ✅Costs $1,215 less on MSRP ($913 MSRP vs $2,128 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 127.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 19.8 PassMark/$ ($913 MSRP vs $2,128 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 155W instead of 205W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (41,017 vs 42,072).
Xeon Gold 6330
2021Why buy it
- ✅+2.6% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (42 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.8 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($2,128 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).
- ❌32.3% higher power demand at 205W vs 155W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7313P better than Xeon Gold 6330?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7313P vs Xeon Gold 6330 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7313P
The EPYC 7313P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,017 points. Launch price was $913.

Xeon Gold 6330
The Xeon Gold 6330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 42 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 42,072 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7313P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6330 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 6330 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313P versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6330 — a 17.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 7313P (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7313P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Gold 6330 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7313P scores 41,017 against the Xeon Gold 6330's 42,072 — a 2.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6330. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313P vs 42 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6330.
| Feature | EPYC 7313P | Xeon Gold 6330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 28 / 56+75% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+19% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+50% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+205% | 42 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm+-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 41,017 | 42,072+3% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7313P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6330 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7313P versus 2933 on the Xeon Gold 6330 — the EPYC 7313P supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6330 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7313P) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6330) — the EPYC 7313P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7313P) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6330).
| Feature | EPYC 7313P | Xeon Gold 6330 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+9% | 2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 6144+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7313P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6330). Direct competitor: EPYC 7313P rivals Xeon Gold 6334; Xeon Gold 6330 rivals EPYC 7453.
| Feature | EPYC 7313P | Xeon Gold 6330 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7313P was priced at $913, while the Xeon Gold 6330 came in at $2128. On launch pricing ($913 vs $2128), EPYC 7313P was $1215 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7313P delivers 44.9 pts/$ vs 19.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6330 — making the EPYC 7313P the 77.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7313P | Xeon Gold 6330 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $913-57% | $2128 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+127% | 19.8 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















