EPYC 7D12
EPYC 7313P
EPYC 7D12 vs EPYC 7313P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7D12 vs EPYC 7313P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7D12 vs EPYC 7313P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7D12
2020Why buy it
- ✅+3.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 155W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7313P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌9.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$913 MSRP
EPYC 7313P
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $87 less on MSRP ($913 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (41,017 vs 42,285).
- ❌82.4% higher power demand at 155W vs 85W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7313P better than EPYC 7D12?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7D12 vs EPYC 7313P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7D12
The EPYC 7D12 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rome (2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 42,285 points. Launch price was $800.
EPYC 7313P
The EPYC 7313P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,017 points. Launch price was $913.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7D12 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 7313P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7D12 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7D12 versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313P — a 20.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 7313P (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 7D12 uses the Rome (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the EPYC 7313P uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the EPYC 7D12 scores 42,285 against the EPYC 7313P's 41,017 — a 3% lead for the EPYC 7D12. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7D12 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313P.
| Feature | EPYC 7D12 | EPYC 7313P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+100% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.7 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 3 GHz+173% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Rome (2020) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 42,285+3% | 41,017 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7D12) and SP3 (EPYC 7313P).
| Feature | EPYC 7D12 | EPYC 7313P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7D12 rivals Xeon Gold 6248; EPYC 7313P rivals Xeon Gold 6334.
| Feature | EPYC 7D12 | EPYC 7313P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7D12 was priced at $1000, while the EPYC 7313P came in at $913. On launch pricing ($1000 vs $913), EPYC 7313P was $87 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7D12 delivers 42.3 pts/$ vs 44.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 7313P — making the EPYC 7313P the 6.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7D12 | EPYC 7313P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $913-9% |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.3 | 44.9+6% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7D12 and EPYC 7313P
