PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6336Y vs Xeon w5-3525 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6336Y vs Xeon w5-3525: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6336Y

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 185W instead of 290W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3525 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 33.8 PassMark/$ ($3,245 MSRP vs $1,339 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon w5-3525 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w5-3525

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Costs $1,906 less on MSRP ($1,339 MSRP vs $3,245 MSRP).
✅Delivers 141.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($1,339 MSRP vs $3,245 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (45,311 vs 45,517).
❌56.8% higher power demand at 290W vs 185W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w5-3525 better than Xeon Gold 6336Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon w5-3525 is ahead with a 12.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6336Y pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Xeon w5-3525 also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6336Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w5-3525 is the better buy right now. Xeon w5-3525 comes in $1,906 cheaper on MSRP at $1,339 MSRP versus $3,245 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6336Y is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 141.2% better value on MSRP (33.8 vs 14.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w5-3525 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and 25% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 36 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon Gold 6336Y vs Xeon w5-3525 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6336Y

The Xeon Gold 6336Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 45,517 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon w5-3525

The Xeon w5-3525 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 45,311 points. Launch price was $1,339.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6336Y packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w5-3525 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6336Y has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6336Y versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-3525 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-3525 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6336Y uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon w5-3525 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6336Y scores 45,517 against the Xeon w5-3525's 45,311 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6336Y. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6336Y vs 45 MB on the Xeon w5-3525.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6336Y	Xeon w5-3525
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+50%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	4.8 GHz+33%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.2 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	45 MB+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	10 nm	Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture	Ice Lake-SP (2021)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	45,517	45,311

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 6336Y uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w5-3525 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6336Y versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-3525 — the Xeon w5-3525 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Gold 6336Y) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3525) — the Xeon w5-3525 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Gold 6336Y) and W790 (Xeon w5-3525).

Feature	Xeon Gold 6336Y	Xeon w5-3525
Socket	LGA4189	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	64	112+75%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w5-3525 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6336Y rivals EPYC 7543; Xeon w5-3525 rivals Threadripper PRO 7955WX.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6336Y	Xeon w5-3525
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Gold 6336Y was priced at $3245, while the Xeon w5-3525 came in at $1339. On launch pricing ($3245 vs $1339), Xeon w5-3525 was $1906 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6336Y delivers 14.0 pts/$ vs 33.8 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3525 — making the Xeon w5-3525 the 82.8% better value option.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6336Y	Xeon w5-3525
MSRP	$3245	$1339-59%
Performance per Dollar	14.0	33.8+141%
Release Date	2021	2024

Search Xeon Gold 6336Y on Amazon

Search Xeon w5-3525 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.