
Xeon Gold 6448H

Xeon Platinum 8571N
Xeon Gold 6448H vs Xeon Platinum 8571N Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Gold 6448H vs Xeon Platinum 8571N FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Gold 6448H vs Xeon Platinum 8571N: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Gold 6448H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 300 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.2 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($3,658 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Xeon Platinum 8571N
2023Why buy it
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 60 MB).
- ✅Costs $3,059 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,658 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 494.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.2 vs 19.2 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,658 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6448H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (68,385 vs 70,292).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6448H better than Xeon Platinum 8571N?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6448H vs Xeon Platinum 8571N Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6448H
The Xeon Gold 6448H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 70,292 points. Launch price was $3,658.

Xeon Platinum 8571N
The Xeon Platinum 8571N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 68,385 points. Launch price was $6,839.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6448H packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8571N has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6448H versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6448H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6448H uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6448H scores 70,292 against the Xeon Platinum 8571N's 68,385 — a 2.8% lead for the Xeon Gold 6448H. L3 cache: 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6448H vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8571N.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6448H | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 52 / 104+63% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+2% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 60 MB | 300 MB (total)+400% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 70,292+3% | 68,385 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,961 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 60,000 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA4677 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 80 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon Gold 6448H) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8571N).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6448H | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 80 | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8571N targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6448H rivals EPYC 9454; Xeon Platinum 8571N rivals EPYC 9454.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6448H | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Cloud Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon Gold 6448H was priced at $3658, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N came in at $599. On launch pricing ($3658 vs $599), Xeon Platinum 8571N was $3059 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6448H delivers 19.2 pts/$ vs 114.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8571N — making the Xeon Platinum 8571N the 142.4% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6448H | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3658 | $599-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.2 | 114.2+495% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















