EPYC 9274F vs Xeon Gold 6448H

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9274F

24 Cores48 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 6448H

32 Cores64 Thrd250 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9274F vs Xeon Gold 6448H Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9274F

24 / 48

73,982

+5.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Gold 6448H

32 / 64

70,292

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9274F vs Xeon Gold 6448H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9274F vs Xeon Gold 6448H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9274F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $598 less on MSRP ($3,060 MSRP vs $3,658 MSRP).
✅Delivers 25.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.2 vs 19.2 PassMark/$ ($3,060 MSRP vs $3,658 MSRP).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌28% higher power demand at 320W vs 250W.

Xeon Gold 6448H

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 250W instead of 320W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9274F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (70,292 vs 73,982).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.2 vs 24.2 PassMark/$ ($3,658 MSRP vs $3,060 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9274F better than Xeon Gold 6448H?

Yes. EPYC 9274F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 18.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 5.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9274F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 256 MB versus 60 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9274F is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.2% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 326.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 60 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9274F is the better buy right now. EPYC 9274F comes in $598 cheaper on MSRP at $3,060 MSRP versus $3,658 MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 25.8% better value on MSRP (24.2 vs 19.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6448H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 9274F vs Xeon Gold 6448H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9274F

The EPYC 9274F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.05 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 73,982 points. Launch price was $3,060.

Xeon Gold 6448H

The Xeon Gold 6448H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 70,292 points. Launch price was $3,658.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9274F packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6448H offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6448H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9274F versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6448H — a 4.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 9274F (base: 4.05 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9274F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6448H uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9274F scores 73,982 against the Xeon Gold 6448H's 70,292 — a 5.1% lead for the EPYC 9274F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9274F vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6448H.

Feature	EPYC 9274F	Xeon Gold 6448H
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+5%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	4.05 GHz+69%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+327%	60 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	73,982+5%	70,292

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9274F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6448H uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9274F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9274F) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6448H). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9274F) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6448H) — the EPYC 9274F offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9274F) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6448H).

Feature	EPYC 9274F	Xeon Gold 6448H
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144+50%	4096
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9274F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6448H). Direct competitor: EPYC 9274F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon Gold 6448H rivals EPYC 9454.

Feature	EPYC 9274F	Xeon Gold 6448H
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9274F was priced at $3060, while the Xeon Gold 6448H came in at $3658. On launch pricing ($3060 vs $3658), EPYC 9274F was $598 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9274F delivers 24.2 pts/$ vs 19.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6448H — making the EPYC 9274F the 22.9% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9274F	Xeon Gold 6448H
MSRP	$3060-16%	$3658
Performance per Dollar	24.2+26%	19.2
Release Date	2022	2023

Search EPYC 9274F on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6448H on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.