Xeon L3110
VS
Celeron 3865U

Xeon L3110 vs Celeron 3865U

VS
Intel

Celeron 3865U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon L3110 is positioned at rank 1027 and the Celeron 3865U is on rank 645, so the Celeron 3865U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon L3110

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
155092%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
29283%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
26016%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
20099%
#1027
Xeon L3110
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $950
100%
#1028
Xeon 2.66
MSRP: $337|Avg: $10
99%
#1029
Xeon X5272
MSRP: $1172|Avg: $76
93%
#1030
Xeon Platinum 8260L
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $750
51%
#1031
Xeon 3.20
MSRP: $851|Avg: $10
51%
#1032
Xeon X5355
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4000
34%
#1033
Xeon E5420
MSRP: $7214|Avg: $6500
21%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3865U

#633
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
874%
#634
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
861%
#635
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
790%
#636
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
787%
#637
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
780%
#639
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
753%
#640
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
722%
#641
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
721%
#642
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
701%
#645
Celeron 3865U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 3865U (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon L3110Celeron 3865U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($950)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake-U (2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon L3110 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon L3110Celeron 3865U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($950)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon L3110 and Celeron 3865U

Intel

Xeon L3110

The Xeon L3110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,338 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Celeron 3865U

The Celeron 3865U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,343 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

The Celeron 3865U is built on the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon L3110 scores 1,338 against the Celeron 3865U's 1,343 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron 3865U. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L3110 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 3865U.

FeatureXeon L3110Celeron 3865U
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+67%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache+200%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Kaby Lake-U (2017)
PassMark
1,338
1,343
Geekbench 6 Single
389
Geekbench 6 Multi
674
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon L3110 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 3865U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon L3110Celeron 3865U
Socket
LGA775
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon L3110) / VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Celeron 3865U). The Celeron 3865U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 610), while the Xeon L3110 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3865U targets Entry-level. Direct competitor: Celeron 3865U rivals Pentium Gold 4415U.

FeatureXeon L3110Celeron 3865U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use
Entry-level