Xeon L3110
VS
Celeron 4205U

Xeon L3110 vs Celeron 4205U

VS
Intel

Celeron 4205U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon L3110 is positioned at rank 1027 and the Celeron 4205U is on rank 152, so the Celeron 4205U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon L3110

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
155092%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
29283%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
26016%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
20099%
#1027
Xeon L3110
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $950
100%
#1028
Xeon 2.66
MSRP: $337|Avg: $10
99%
#1029
Xeon X5272
MSRP: $1172|Avg: $76
93%
#1030
Xeon Platinum 8260L
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $750
51%
#1031
Xeon 3.20
MSRP: $851|Avg: $10
51%
#1032
Xeon X5355
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4000
34%
#1033
Xeon E5420
MSRP: $7214|Avg: $6500
21%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 4205U

#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
98%
#140
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
326%
#141
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
321%
#142
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
295%
#143
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
294%
#144
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
291%
#146
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
281%
#147
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
269%
#148
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
269%
#149
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
262%
#152
Celeron 4205U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#158
Core i5-3210M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 4205U (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon L3110Celeron 4205U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($950)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
✨ Modern (Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon L3110 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon L3110Celeron 4205U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($950)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon L3110 and Celeron 4205U

Intel

Xeon L3110

The Xeon L3110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,338 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Celeron 4205U

The Celeron 4205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,350 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

The Celeron 4205U is built on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon L3110 scores 1,338 against the Celeron 4205U's 1,350 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron 4205U. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L3110 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 4205U.

FeatureXeon L3110Celeron 4205U
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+67%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache+200%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
PassMark
1,338
1,350
Geekbench 6 Single
347
Geekbench 6 Multi
585
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon L3110 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 4205U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon L3110Celeron 4205U
Socket
LGA775
FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon L3110) / VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 4205U). The Celeron 4205U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Xeon L3110 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 4205U rivals Pentium Gold 4417U.

FeatureXeon L3110Celeron 4205U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget
Xeon L3110 vs Celeron 4205U