Xeon L3110 vs Xeon L5240

Intel

Xeon L3110

45 WW2009
VS
Intel

Xeon L5240

40 WW2008

Xeon L3110 vs Xeon L5240 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon L3110 vs Xeon L5240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon L3110 vs Xeon L5240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon L3110

2009

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,000 MSRP, while Xeon L5240 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Xeon L5240

    2008

    Why buy it

    • βœ…Draws 40W instead of 45W, a 5W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (1,337 vs 1,338).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Xeon L3110 better than Xeon L5240?
    Yes. Xeon L3110 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.1% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Xeon L3110 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 0.1% stronger overall PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L3110 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Xeon L3110 is the better buy right now. Xeon L3110 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,000 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (1.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Xeon L3110 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Xeon L3110 vs Xeon L5240 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Xeon L3110

    The Xeon L3110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,338 points. Launch price was $800.

    Intel

    Xeon L5240

    The Xeon L5240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,337 points. Launch price was $800.

    ⚑

    Processing Power

    In PassMark, the Xeon L3110 scores 1,338 against the Xeon L5240's 1,337 β€” a 0.1% lead for the Xeon L3110. Both processors carry 6 MB L2 Cache of L3 cache.

    FeatureXeon L3110Xeon L5240
    Base Clock
    3 GHz
    3 GHz
    L3 Cache
    6 MB L2 Cache
    6 MB L2 Cache
    Process
    45 nm
    45 nm
    PassMark
    1,338
    1,337
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Xeon L3110 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon L5240 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureXeon L3110Xeon L5240
    Socket
    LGA775
    LGA771
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0