Turion 64 X2 TL-58 vs Xeon L3110

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 vs Xeon L3110 Performance Spectrum

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

2 / 2

1,339

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon L3110

1,338

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 vs Xeon L3110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 vs Xeon L3110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon L3110

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,338 vs 1,339).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,000 MSRP, while Turion 64 X2 TL-58 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌4400% higher power demand at 45W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 X2 TL-58 better than Xeon L3110?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L3110 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon L3110 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Turion 64 X2 TL-58 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,000 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon L3110 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (1.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon L3110 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 vs Xeon L3110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

The Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,339 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon L3110

The Xeon L3110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,338 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is built on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 scores 1,339 against the Xeon L3110's 1,338 — a 0.1% lead for the Turion 64 X2 TL-58.

Feature	Turion 64 X2 TL-58	Xeon L3110
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Tyler (2007−2009)	—
PassMark	1,339	1,338