Core i3-4010Y vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58

Core i3-4010Y vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-4010Y

2 / 4

1,358

+1.4%

Celeron 867

Celeron P4500

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

1,339

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4010Y vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4010Y vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4010Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4200, while Turion 64 X2 TL-58 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,339 vs 1,358).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4010Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4010Y better than Turion 64 X2 TL-58?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is ahead with a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4010Y pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4010Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4010Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-4010Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4010Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4010Y vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4010Y

The Core i3-4010Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,358 points. Launch price was $297.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

The Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,339 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4010Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion 64 X2 TL-58's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-4010Y versus 1.9 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 — a 37.5% clock advantage for the Turion 64 X2 TL-58. The Core i3-4010Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 uses Tyler (2007−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4010Y scores 1,358 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-58's 1,339 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i3-4010Y.

Feature	Core i3-4010Y	Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz	1.9 GHz+46%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Tyler (2007−2009)
PassMark	1,358+1%	1,339

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4010Y) / not specified (Turion 64 X2 TL-58). The Core i3-4010Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4200), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4010Y targets Mobile.