Turion 64 X2 TL-58 vs Xeon L5240

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 vs Xeon L5240 Performance Spectrum

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

2 / 2

1,339

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon L5240

1,337

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 vs Xeon L5240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 vs Xeon L5240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 40W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon L5240

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,337 vs 1,339).
❌3900% higher power demand at 40W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 X2 TL-58 better than Xeon L5240?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L5240 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 still makes the most sense overall. Turion 64 X2 TL-58 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon L5240 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 vs Xeon L5240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

The Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,339 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon L5240

The Xeon L5240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,337 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is built on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 scores 1,339 against the Xeon L5240's 1,337 — a 0.1% lead for the Turion 64 X2 TL-58.

Feature	Turion 64 X2 TL-58	Xeon L5240
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Tyler (2007−2009)	—
PassMark	1,339	1,337