Core i3-L13G4 vs Xeon L3110

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-L13G4 vs Xeon L3110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-L13G4 vs Xeon L3110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-L13G4

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 45W, a 38W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Xeon L3110 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).

Xeon L3110

2009

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,338 vs 1,349).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,000 MSRP, while Core i3-L13G4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌542.9% higher power demand at 45W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-L13G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-L13G4 better than Xeon L3110?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L3110 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-L13G4 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-L13G4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-L13G4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 5 cores and 5 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-L13G4 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon L3110 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i3-L13G4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,000 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon L3110 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (1.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-L13G4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2009). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-L13G4 vs Xeon L3110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-L13G4

The Core i3-L13G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FC-CSP1016. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $281.

Xeon L3110

The Xeon L3110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,338 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-L13G4 is built on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-L13G4 scores 1,349 against the Xeon L3110's 1,338 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-L13G4. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-L13G4 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L3110.

Feature	Core i3-L13G4	Xeon L3110
Cores / Threads	5 / 5	—
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	—
Base Clock	0.8 GHz	3 GHz+275%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6 MB L2 Cache+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB	—
Process	10 nm-78%	45 nm
Architecture	Lakefield (2020)	—
PassMark	1,349	1,338

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-L13G4 uses the FC-CSP1016 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon L3110 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-L13G4	Xeon L3110
Socket	FC-CSP1016	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4x-4267	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-L13G4) / not specified (Xeon L3110). The Core i3-L13G4 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Xeon L3110 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-L13G4 targets Mobile.