Xeon L3110 vs Celeron G1610T
Xeon L3110
Celeron G1610T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon L3110 is positioned at rank 1027 and the Celeron G1610T is on rank 575, so the Celeron G1610T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon L3110
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1610T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon L3110 | Celeron G1610T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($950) | ✅ More affordable ($42) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon L3110 | Celeron G1610T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2153%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($950) | ✅ More affordable ($42) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon L3110 and Celeron G1610T
Xeon L3110
The Xeon L3110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,338 points. Launch price was $800.
Celeron G1610T
The Celeron G1610T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 December 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $89.
Processing Power
The Celeron G1610T is built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon L3110 scores 1,338 against the Celeron G1610T's 1,333 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon L3110. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L3110 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1610T.
| Feature | Xeon L3110 | Celeron G1610T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | — | 2.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+30% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache+200% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | — | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,338 | 1,333 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 393 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 674 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon L3110 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G1610T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon L3110 | Celeron G1610T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon L3110) / VT-x (Celeron G1610T). The Celeron G1610T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Xeon L3110 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1610T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1610T rivals Pentium G2020T.
| Feature | Xeon L3110 | Celeron G1610T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Xeon L3110 launched at $1000 MSRP, while the Celeron G1610T debuted at $42. At current prices ($950 vs $42), the Celeron G1610T is $908 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon L3110 delivers 1.4 pts/$ vs 31.7 pts/$ for the Celeron G1610T — making the Celeron G1610T the 183% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon L3110 | Celeron G1610T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $42-96% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $950 | $42-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 31.7+2164% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon L3110 and Celeron G1610T
